Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in July.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5600 MT/s, ECC memory included - this too depends on the motherboard.

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the 9700X is set to have multi-thread performance matching the fastest laptop chips such as the 24-core Core i9-13950HX. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9700X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with a 4 nm TSMC process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 65 W. It'll probably consume at least 100 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D ist ein High-End-Desktop-Prozessor der Raphael Serie mit 8-Zen-4-Kernen und SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), womit dieser in Summe bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Nach der Ankündigung im Januar 2023 auf der CES in Las Vegas startete die Markteinführung im April 2023. Nach der Markteinführung der beiden Topmodelle AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D und dem AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D folgte dann das dritte Modell, welches mit dem 3D V-Cache deutlich mehr Gamingleistung bietet. Die CPU-Kerne takten mit 4,2 GHz in der Basis und können mit bis zu 5 GHz (Einzelkern Turbo) betrieben werden. Der AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D besitzt einen CCD mit 8-Kernen, welcher den schnellen 3D-V-Cache beinhaltet. Damit ändert sich der Aufbau im Vergleich zu den beiden Ryzen-9-Modellen erheblich, denn diese beiden besitzen zwei CCDs, von denen jedoch nur einer den 3D-V-Cache nutzen kann.

Die Leistung des AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D ist durchweg gut, wenngleich die Multi-Thread-Leistung aufgrund der acht nativen Rechenkerne etwas leidet. Die eigentliche Kernkompetenz des AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D ist jedoch der Bereich des Gamings und das beherrscht der Prozessor außerordentlich gut. Im Test sehen wir eine durchweg hohe Gaming-Performance, womit sogar ein Intel Core i9-13900K geschlagen werden kann. 

Bei der Leistungsaufnahme orientiert sich der AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D an den anderen beiden Modellen mit 3D-V-Cache, womit auch der 8-Kerner extrem sparsam ist. In Zahlen bedeutet dies, dass auch der AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D mit einer TDP von bis zu 120 Watt spezifiziert ist. Das PPT (Package Power Tracking) ebenfalls mit bis zu 162 Watt angegeben. Zum Vergleich: ein AMD Ryzen 9 7950X ist mit 170 Watt (TDP) respektive 230 Watt (PPT) spezifiziert.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9700XAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
CodenameGranite RidgeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Serie: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5500 MHz4200 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
TDP65 Watt120 Watt
Technology4 nm & 6 nm5 nm
max. Temp.95 °C89 °C
SocketAM5AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
Die Size193 mm2
$449 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1203 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20485 Points (19%)
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2211 Points (90%)
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (70%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
870 Points (95%)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7956 Points (19%)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3178 Points (20%)
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
346 Points (96%)
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.2 Points (47%)
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9457 Points (57%)
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57914 Points (42%)
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108170 Points (69%)
94035 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17765 Points (22%)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
59.6 s (1%)
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13549 Points (21%)
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
82553 MIPS (47%)
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7894 MIPS (93%)
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (4%)
169.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (10%)
344 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
26.4 fps (46%)
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
244 Seconds (3%)
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
154 Seconds (1%)
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18794 Points (40%)
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
30757 Points (76%)
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38088 Points (68%)
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14306 Points (60%)
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3373 Points (78%)
2634 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
16817 Points (65%)
14288 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2507 Points (84%)
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (65%)     max: 2027 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14613 Points (26%)
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2402 Points (10%)
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14698 Points (46%)
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9801 Points (98%)
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
59594 Points (58%)
54840 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
383 ms (0%)
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
346 Points (90%)
282 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
398 Points (71%)
353 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2174 Points (80%)
2216 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
180.2 Watt (31%)
218 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
174.6 Watt (32%)
207 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83 Watt (55%)
121.6 Watt (80%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 89% n=45

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 16. 07:37:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1768545423s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 Jan 2026 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.075s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.076s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks & Tech > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)