Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7600X

Der AMD Ryzen 5 7600X ist ein der aktuelle schnellste Ryzen 5 Desktop Prozessor und gehört zur aktuellen Raphael-Serie. Der Ryzen 5 7600X besitzt 6 Kerne und bietet dank SMT insgesamt 12 Threads.

Der Ryzen 5 7600X taktet mit 4,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,3 GHz auf einem Kern.

Die Leistung des AMD Ryzen 5 7600X ist durchweg bei allen Anwendungen hervorragend und deutlich besser als beim AMD Ryzen 5 5600X. AMD konnte vor allem die Single-Thread-Performance aufgrund der neuen, kleineren Fertigung durch höhere Taktraten und der höheren TDP deutlich steigern. Dadurch kann der AMD Ryzen 5 7600X mit einem Intel Core i5-12600K mithalten.

Die neuen Zen4-Prozessoren werden alle im 4 nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was die hohen Taktfrequenzen ermöglicht. Den Chiplet-Aufbau gibt es weiterhin, was bedeutet, dass unter dem Heatspreader zusätzlich der I/O-Die seinen Platz hat. Dieser wird hingegen nicht mehr in 12 nm produziert, sondern im kleineren 6 nm Verfahren. Zudem gibt es eine kleine iGPU welche jedoch nur für die 2D-Darstellung geeignet ist.

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

show full text
ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7600XMediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Mediatek
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X « 4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock4700 - 5300 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 8
TDP105 Watt
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
Technology5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V16 nm
Die Size1x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2PowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7600X
49.4 pt (69%)
AMD E1-2100
2.47 -95%
...
Intel Core i7-13800H
46.8 -5%
Intel Core i7-13700HX
46.8 -5%
Intel Core i7-12700
47 -5%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
47.2 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
48.3 -2%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
48.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
48.5 -2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
48.7 -1%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
49.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
49.4
Intel Core i5-13600K
49.4 0%
Intel Core i7-13700
49.5 0%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
50 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
50.5 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
50.6 2%
Intel Core i9-12900K
50.7 3%
Intel Core i5-14600K
51 3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
51.5 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
51.8 5%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
72.1 46%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15006     avg: 15252     median: 15236 (14%)     max: 15510 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1953     avg: 1964     median: 1965 (84%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 759     avg: 761     median: 761 (85%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5882     avg: 5973     median: 5966 (15%)     max: 6076 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2434     avg: 2504     median: 2517 (16%)     max: 2536 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 311     avg: 313.7     median: 314 (95%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.79     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (37%)     max: 28.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (92%)     max: 3.72 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8212     avg: 8455     median: 8480 (51%)     max: 8631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48381     avg: 49427     median: 49430 (36%)     max: 49837 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88546     avg: 90010     median: 90309 (63%)     max: 91222 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15797     avg: 15925     median: 15948 (19%)     max: 16010 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 74.491     avg: 78.5     median: 78.8 (1%)     max: 82.19 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.709     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.933 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16178 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 65569     avg: 68816     median: 69291 (40%)     max: 70615 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7661     avg: 7993     median: 8058 (96%)     max: 8101 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147.8 fps (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
367 fps (85%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.2     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (37%)     max: 21.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.2 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 322     avg: 329.6     median: 328 (4%)     max: 344 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 202     avg: 206.1     median: 205 (1%)     max: 214 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3726     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.395 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16979     avg: 17291     median: 17290.5 (37%)     max: 17602 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
367.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82479     avg: 83000     median: 82999.5 (73%)     max: 83520 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 25396     avg: 25731     median: 25731 (70%)     max: 26066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 92244     avg: 98319     median: 98318.5 (80%)     max: 104393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 92907     avg: 98466     median: 98466 (80%)     max: 104025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 94868     avg: 99772     median: 99772 (84%)     max: 104676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19327     avg: 19377     median: 19377 (49%)     max: 19427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30671     avg: 30681     median: 30681 (55%)     max: 30691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10458     avg: 10645     median: 10645 (45%)     max: 10832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2159     avg: 2212     median: 2217 (94%)     max: 2230 Points
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (7%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11093     avg: 11914     median: 12003 (22%)     max: 12185 Points
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2070     avg: 2120     median: 2126 (9%)     max: 2137 Points
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11123     avg: 11886     median: 11982 (38%)     max: 12112 Points
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8596     avg: 8967     median: 9021 (90%)     max: 9048 Points
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45422     avg: 47461     median: 47694 (52%)     max: 48205 Points
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 441     avg: 447.8     median: 448 (1%)     max: 451 ms
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (5%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 295     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (86%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 356     avg: 373.3     median: 370.5 (77%)     max: 395 Points
35 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (24%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2104     avg: 2186     median: 2193 (84%)     max: 2256 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
227 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
215 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
91.5 Watt (61%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.7 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7600X → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 18% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 02:43:30

#0 checking url part for id 14615 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14615 +0.021s ... 0.051s

#7 got single benchmarks 14615 +0.029s ... 0.079s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.017s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.016s ... 0.112s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.253s ... 0.365s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.367s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.369s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.37s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.404s

#16 return log +0.029s ... 0.433s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)