Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia Quadro T2000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Mittelklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) mit 1024 Shadern und vergleichbaren Taktraten. Weiters stehen 64 Texture Mapping Units und 32 ROPs zur Verfügung. Die bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 Grafikspeicher werden mit 2000 MHz getaktet und per 128 Bit Grafikbus angebunden. Bei den maximalen 60 Watt TGP taktet die GPU mit 1575 (Base) bis 1785 MHz (Boost).

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große Notebooks / mobile Workstations. Die Max-Q Variante ist eine auf Effizienz optimierte Version der RTX 4000 mit verringerten Taktraten. Aktuell gibt es anscheinend 3 verschiedene Max-Q Varianten mit einem TGP von 90, 85 und 80 Watt.

VarianteShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile256011013501770
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560909601485
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560859001440
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560807801380
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Features

Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0). 

Performance

Je nach Variante, kann die Max-Q Version deutlich Performance zur normalen RTX 4000 einbüßen (bis zu 12 % weniger Boost-Takt). Dadurch kann sich die Max-Q Variante schon der Performance der RTX 3000 nähern. Bei Spielen sollte sich die Performance in der Nähe der mobilen RTX 2070 einreihen. 

Mit einem TGP von 80-90 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q trotzdem nur für größere Notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro Turing Serie
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3N19E-Q3 MAX-Q
ArchitekturTuringTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified2560 - unified
Kerntakt1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt8000 MHz14000 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Speichergröße4 GB8 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Stromverbrauch60 Watt80 - 90 Watt
Transistors4.7 Billion10.8 Billion
Herstellungsprozess12 nm12 nm
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum27.05.2019 27.05.2019
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
23.7 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6724 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6764 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
23809 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35167 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
15010 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17049 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
35402 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (27%)     max: 13392 Points
min: 19079     avg: 19888     median: 19888 (40%)     max: 20697 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (19%)     max: 13677 Points
min: 23464     avg: 23574     median: 23574 (34%)     max: 23684 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (46%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
116 fps (50%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (26%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
128 fps (36%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (17%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
96.6 fps (36%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (17%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
77.6 fps (27%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (54%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
131 fps (70%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (35%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
122 fps (42%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (30%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
175 fps (47%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (51%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 112.1     avg: 121.1     median: 121.1 (56%)     max: 130 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (26%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 225.4     avg: 245.2     median: 245.2 (38%)     max: 265 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (16%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 89.3     avg: 93     median: 93 (35%)     max: 96.6 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (22%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162     avg: 185     median: 185 (33%)     max: 208 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (31%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162.1     avg: 186.1     median: 186.1 (48%)     max: 210 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (35%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 181.6     avg: 204.8     median: 204.8 (44%)     max: 228 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 129.5     avg: 150.8     median: 150.8 (40%)     max: 172 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
81.9 fps (45%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
35.3 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
114.4 fps (54%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
181 fps (59%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
38.3 fps (65%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
159.9 fps (43%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
35.7 fps (50%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
88.3 fps (63%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
60.5 fps (57%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
64.1 fps (49%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111.4 fps (23%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (28%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (17%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (30%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (36%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (30%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (27%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (55%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 191     avg: 210.5     median: 210.5 (57%)     max: 230 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
149.2 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.8 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
168.4 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.4 Points per Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 Points per Watt (42%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 148% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3  fps
QHD 2560x1440
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36  fps

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 01. 22:17:18

#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:55 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.045s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.051s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#19 composed specs +0s ... 0.052s

#20 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#21 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.032s ... 0.084s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#24 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.007s ... 0.091s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.093s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.095s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.001s ... 0.096s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#29 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.006s ... 0.102s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.117s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.117s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#108 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.124s

#109 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.124s

#110 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.128s

#111 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.128s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#127 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.129s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.13s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#147 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.134s

#148 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.134s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.048s ... 0.182s

#150 return log +0.003s ... 0.184s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)