Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q

Die Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (offiziell Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) ist eine mobile High-End-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert auf wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop) auf einen abgespeckten GP104 Chip mit 2048 Shader. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Kaby-Lake-Generation gedacht und die Stromsparvariante der Quadro P5000 mit leicht reduzierten Taktraten (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) und deutlich reduziertem Stromverbrauch (80 versus 100 Watt TGP).

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Die theoretische Leistung sollte vergleichbar zur GTX 1070 Max-Q sein, und dadurch einige Prozent unterhalb der normalen Quadro P5000.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro P5000 mit Max-Q Design ist mit 80 Watt genauso hoch wie die Quadro P4000 Max-Q und 20 Watt geringer also die nicht Max-Q Varianten beider Quadro Karten. Dadurch liegt sie nur 5 Watt oberhalb der Quadro P3000 und kann daher auch in kleineren Notebooks verbaut werden.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Die Nvidia Quadro P4000 ist eine mobile High-End-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert derzeit auf keiner Consumer Karte direkt und positioniert sich zwischen Quadro P3000 (GTX 1060) und Quadro P5000 (GTX 1070) ein. Sie bietet 1792 Shader und dürfte daher auf den selben GP104 Chip der P5000 (2048 Shader) basieren. Sie bietet 8 GB GDDR5 bei gleicher Bandbreite und ist ebenfalls mit 100 Watt TGP (73.4 W TDP) von Nvidia spezifiziert.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-QNVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P Serie
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN17E-Q5 Max-QN17E-Q3
ArchitekturPascalPascal
Pipelines2048 - unified1792 - unified
Kerntakt1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt6006 MHz6006 MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße16 GB16 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch100 Watt73.4 Watt
Herstellungsprozess16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum11.01.2017 11.01.2017
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P4000
18.1 pt (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3825 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3960 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
369407 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
18726 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
53834 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
10158 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
12259 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
81998 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
12346 Points (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
15433 Points (22%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
36260 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
42370 Points (29%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark 06
29155 Points (42%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
53 fps (38%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
49.9 fps (84%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
50.9 fps (62%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
19.7 fps (82%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.8 fps (44%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.2 fps (56%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
59.2 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
48.4 fps (59%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
117.1 fps (51%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
83.1 fps (24%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
67.2 fps (22%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
39.4 fps (24%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.9 fps (24%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
10.3 fps (26%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
97.1 fps (52%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
115.2 fps (39%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
93.6 fps (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6831 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
105.6 fps (38%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
107.2 fps (28%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
59.9 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1114 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
408.4 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
209.8 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1847 Samples/s (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3564 Samples/s (6%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8609 Points (16%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
80.8 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 Points per Watt (0%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P4000 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
61.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
58.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
54  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
66.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
55.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
45.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
43.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
119.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
112.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
91  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
87.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
115.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
103.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
76.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
65.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
122.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
116.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
89.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
85.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
159.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
113.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
77.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
41.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
153.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
106.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
96.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
84.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
236.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
184.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
151.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
63.3  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro P4000:
67.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
61.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
59.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
44.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro P4000:
196.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
174.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro P4000:
162.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro P4000:
96  fps

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 20:32:17

#0 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7666 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:27:11 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.049s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.049s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#19 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.026s ... 0.075s

#21 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.075s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.078s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.083s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 7666 +0.002s ... 0.084s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#26 got single benchmarks 7666 +0.008s ... 0.094s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.094s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.104s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#73 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.113s

#74 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.113s

#75 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.12s

#76 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.12s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#107 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.121s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#148 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.128s

#149 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.128s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#151 return log +0.003s ... 0.132s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)