Bosgame VTA-439 im Test: Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 passt hervorragend in Mini-PCs

Name: BOSGAME VTA-439
Brand: BOSGAME

Viel Speicherplatz und Leistung.

Bosgame meldet sich mit einem markanten neuen Industriedesign für seinen neuesten Mini-PC zurück, der mit dem aktuellen AMD-Zen-5c-Prozessor Gorgon Point ausgestattet ist. Er mag etwas groß sein, bietet aber mehr SSD-Steckplätze als die meisten Konkurrenten.
Allen Ngo (übersetzt von Falk Hinrichs) Veröffentlicht am 14.11.2026 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...
Mini PC Desktop AMD Zen 5

Fazit – mehr Größe, mehr Funktionen

Zu den größten Stärken des Bosgame VTA-439 zählen die Unterstützung für bis zu drei M.2-SSDs in voller Länge, austauschbarer RAM und OcuLink. Den meisten anderen Mini-PCs fehlen viele dieser Funktionen. Der Bosgame spielt seine Stärken daher vor allem aus, wenn Nutzer diese besonderen Eigenschaften nutzen können. Andernfalls gibt es kleinere Alternativen mit ebenso schnellen oder noch leistungsfähigeren Prozessoren.

Testgerät zur Verfügung gestellt von BOSGAME

Download der lizensierten Bewertungsgrafik als PNG / SVG

Der neue Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 mit Zen-5c-Architektur kann bis zu 15 Prozent schneller sein als der auslaufende Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. Das ist zwar willkommen, dürfte für leistungsorientierte Nutzer aber keinen großen Unterschied machen. Mini-PCs mit der konkurrierenden Intel-Panther-Lake-Plattform können eine deutlich höhere Grafikleistung als die Radeon-890M-Serie bieten und sind damit für Nutzer interessant, die Wert auf eine schnelle iGPU legen.

Zu den nennenswerten Nachteilen des VTA-439 gehören die fehlende VESA-Unterstützung, die vergleichsweise große Bauform sowie das Fehlen integrierter Mikrofone und Lautsprecher. Stärker auf den HTPC-Einsatz ausgerichtete Modelle wie die Beelink-SER- oder die GTi-Serie bieten solche Funktionen häufig und lassen sich dadurch besser in das Zuhause und in die Sprachsteuerung integrieren.

Pro

+ unterstützt bis zu drei M.2-22980-SSDs und zwei DDR5-SODIMMs

+ gute Anschlussauswahl einschließlich OcuLink

+ attraktives Industriedesign ohne RGB

+ gute Leistung mit AMD Zen 5c

+ relativ kleines 120-W-Netzteil

Contra

- weder integrierter Lautsprecher noch integriertes Mikrofon

- weder USB-C-PD noch SD-Kartenleser

- Wartung nicht werkzeuglos möglich

- keine VESA-Unterstützung

- relativ groß

Preis und Verfügbarkeit

Bosgame liefert den VTA-439 direkt zu Preisen ab 1.050 US-Dollar.

Preis bei Amazon prüfen
Search Amazon for BOSGAME VTA-439

Bosgame stellt Mini-PCs für den professionellen Einsatz her, die mit Funktionen ausgestattet sind, die bei verbraucherorientierten Alternativen normalerweise fehlen. Der VTA-439 ist das neueste professionelle Modell und mit AMDs aktuellem Ryzen AI 9 470 ausgestattet, der auf den Ryzen AI 9 370 des Vorjahres folgt.

Unser Testgerät verfügt über die genannte Zen-5c-CPU, 32 GB RAM und eine 1-TB-SSD und kostet etwa 1.050 US-Dollar. Barebone-Varianten sind zum Zeitpunkt des Tests leider nicht erhältlich.

Zu den Konkurrenten des VTA-439 gehören andere büroorientierte Mini-PCs wie die GMK-EVO-Serie oder die Asus-NUC-Serie.

Weitere Bosgame-Tests:

Technische Daten

BOSGAME VTA-439

Prozessor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 12c/24t, 4 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5, 8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Gorgon Point (Zen 5)

Grafikkarte

AMD Radeon 890M, Kerntakt: 3092 MHz, Speichertakt: 2800 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.31019.2002

RAM

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 46-46-46-90

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Massenspeicher

Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00, 1024 GB

Soundkarte

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anschlüsse

1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Anschlüsse: 3.5 mm combo

Netzwerk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Mediatek RZ717 WiFi 7 160 MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Abmessungen

Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 50 x 154 x 152

Betriebssystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Sonstiges

12 Monate Garantie

Gewicht

764 g, Netzteil: 285 g

Preis

1050 USD

Hinweis: Der Hersteller kann abweichende Bauteile wie Bildschirme, Laufwerke und Speicherriegel mit ähnlichen Spezifikationen unter dem gleichen Modellnamen einsetzen.

Vollständige Spezifikationen anzeigen

[+] Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

» vergleiche

Gehäuse

Das industrielle Gehäusedesign sorgt für Abwechslung gegenüber dem minimalistischen Erscheinungsbild des Mac Mini oder Beelink GTi. Besonders gefällt uns, wie die sichtbaren Lüftungsöffnungen das Design ergänzen, während sie bei anderen Mini-PCs meist versteckt oder möglichst klein gehalten werden. Die Oberflächen sind stabil und geben kaum nach, allerdings sind die schwarze Vorder- und Rückseite anfällig für Fingerabdrücke.

Größenvergleich

Ausstattung

Vorne: 3,5-mm-Headsetanschluss, USB-C 4.0 mit DisplayPort 2.1, 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, Ein-/Aus-Taste, Reset-Taste

Hinten: 2x RJ-45 (2,5 Gbit/s), USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-A 2.0, OcuLink, DisplayPort 1.4, USB-C 4.0 mit DisplayPort 2.1, HDMI 2.1, 3,5-mm-Headsetanschluss, Netzteilanschluss

Kommunikation

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1736 (1716^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Mediatek RZ717 WiFi 7 160 MHz	1655 (1615^min - 1720^max) MBit/s
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel BE201 320MHz	1618 (1586^min - 1644^max) MBit/s -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1090 (1026^min - 1157^max) MBit/s -34%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
BOSGAME VTA-439 Mediatek RZ717 WiFi 7 160 MHz	1807 (1722^min - 1884^max) MBit/s
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1759 (1660^min - 1875^max) MBit/s -3%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel BE201 320MHz	1605 (1475^min - 1665^max) MBit/s -11%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	984 (805^min - 1153^max) MBit/s -46%

BOSGAME VTA-439; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1615-1720) MBit/s

BOSGAME VTA-439; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1807 (1722-1884) MBit/s

Wartung

Drei M.2-2280-SSD-Steckplätze und zwei DDR5-SODIMM-Steckplätze sind mit einem Kreuzschlitzschraubendreher leicht zugänglich

Leistung

Testbedingungen

Vor den folgenden Benchmarks haben wir Windows und das BIOS auf den Leistungsmodus eingestellt.

Prozessorleistung

Cinebench R15 Multi-Dauertest

BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470: Ø3284 (3227.37-3606.53) Points

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø2582 (2556.24-2596.05) Points

Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255: Ø2565 (2544.37-2588.16) Points

GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3051 (2997.38-3072.2) Points

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø2385 (2352.8-2791.74) Points

Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3009 (2951.59-3148.12) Points

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	86.1 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	83.3 pt
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	80.1 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	79.8 pt
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	78.8 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	77.2 pt
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	72.9 pt
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	72.5 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	72.2 pt
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	71.9 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	69 pt
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	66.7 pt
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	59.3 pt
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	47.6 pt
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	42 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	23997 (21220.6^min - 23996.7^max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (20813 - 23997, n=8)	23030 Points -4%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20882 Points -13%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20660 (20396.6^min - 20660^max) Points -14%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	19830 Points -17%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17995 (17785.9^min - 17994.8^max) Points -25%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	17052 Points -29%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	17015 (15002.4^min - 17015.3^max) Points -29%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16661 (16363.9^min - 16661^max) Points -31%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	16402 (16130.8^min - 16402.1^max) Points -32%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15947 (9378.75^min - 15947.3^max) Points -34%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14784 Points -38%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	10864 (10591.5^min - 10864.2^max) Points -55%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	7662 (7500.47^min - 7661.93^max) Points -68%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	6985 Points -71%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2166 Points +4%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	2091 Points
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	2086 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2071 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (2011 - 2091, n=8)	2063 Points -1%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2027 Points -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	2010 Points -4%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	1990 Points -5%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	1909 Points -9%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1788 Points -14%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1770 Points -15%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1718 Points -18%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	1688 Points -19%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	1435 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	9354 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (8104 - 9354, n=8)	8930 Points -5%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8172 Points -13%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8062 Points -14%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	7749 Points -17%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7014 Points -25%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	6724 Points -28%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	6669 Points -29%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6480 Points -31%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6431 Points -31%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6250 Points -33%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	5761 Points -38%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	4233 Points -55%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	2952 Points -68%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	2780 Points -70%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	837 Points +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	822 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (793 - 822, n=8)	809 Points -2%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	793 Points -4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	793 Points -4%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	782 Points -5%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	777 Points -5%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	767 Points -7%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	733 Points -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	698 Points -15%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	695 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	688 Points -16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	677 Points -18%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	646 Points -21%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	558 Points -32%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	3607 (3227.37^min - 3606.53^max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (3068 - 3607, n=8)	3435 Points -5%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3151 Points -13%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3072 (2997.38^min - 3072.2^max) Points -15%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	3053 Points -15%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	2792 (2352.8^min - 2791.74^max) Points -23%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2632 Points -27%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2627 (2586.82^min - 2626.57^max) Points -27%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2596 (2556.24^min - 2596.05^max) Points -28%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2588 (2544.37^min - 2588.16^max) Points -28%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2537 (2510.2^min - 2537.27^max) Points -30%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2300 Points -36%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	1609 (1564.76^min - 1609.27^max) Points -55%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	1150 (1101.32^min - 1149.92^max) Points -68%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	1101 Points -69%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	322 Points 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	322 Points
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	312 Points -3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	309 Points -4%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	307 Points -5%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	301 Points -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (192.7 - 322, n=8)	300 Points -7%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	289 Points -10%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	284 Points -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	283 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	276 Points -14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	276 Points -14%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	238 Points -26%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	231 Points -28%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	448 Seconds * -215%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	429 Seconds * -202%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	315 Seconds * -122%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	231 Seconds * -63%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	210 Seconds * -48%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	199 Seconds * -40%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	194 Seconds * -37%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	194 Seconds * -37%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	191 Seconds * -35%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	185 Seconds * -30%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	184 Seconds * -30%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	163 Seconds * -15%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	156 Seconds * -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (140 - 154, n=8)	145.8 Seconds * -3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	142 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (73258 - 84545, n=8)	79146 MIPS 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	78767 MIPS
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	76051 MIPS -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70937 MIPS -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70782 MIPS -10%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	69787 MIPS -11%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	67343 MIPS -15%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	66409 MIPS -16%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	63143 MIPS -20%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	61940 MIPS -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	57560 MIPS -27%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	52585 MIPS -33%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	36572 MIPS -54%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	35907 MIPS -54%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	31119 MIPS -60%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6714 MIPS +2%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6676 MIPS +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	6562 MIPS
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (6244 - 6562, n=8)	6449 MIPS -2%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6237 MIPS -5%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	6220 MIPS -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6164 MIPS -6%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6111 MIPS -7%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6107 MIPS -7%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6041 MIPS -8%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	5763 MIPS -12%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	5544 MIPS -16%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	5488 MIPS -16%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	5386 MIPS -18%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	5356 MIPS -18%

Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	16207 Points +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	15842 Points
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	15698 Points -1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15284 Points -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (11437 - 16116, n=11)	14763 Points -7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	14323 Points -10%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	13470 Points -15%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13362 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13184 Points -17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	12825 Points -19%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	12640 Points -20%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11804 Points -25%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	10784 Points -32%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	8123 Points -49%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	7067 Points -55%

Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	3000 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (2872 - 3000, n=11)	2939 Points -2%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2919 Points -3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2878 Points -4%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2867 Points -4%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	2856 Points -5%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	2778 Points -7%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	2750 Points -8%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2694 Points -10%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2694 Points -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2687 Points -10%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2591 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2546 Points -15%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	2293 Points -24%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	1991 Points -34%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	16310 Points +3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	15887 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15703 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (12418 - 16002, n=8)	14682 Points -8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	14283 Points -10%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13908 Points -12%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	12420 Points -22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12196 Points -23%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	11791 Points -26%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11769 Points -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	11614 Points -27%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10625 Points -33%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	9044 Points -43%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	6990 Points -56%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	6275 Points -61%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2118 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2111 Points +3%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	2097 Points +2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (1950 - 2193, n=8)	2061 Points 0%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2054 Points 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	2054 Points
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2004 Points -2%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	2001 Points -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	1992 Points -3%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1986 Points -3%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1900 Points -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1810 Points -12%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1689 Points -18%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	1639 Points -20%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	1512 Points -26%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	28.1 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (23.6 - 28.5, n=8)	26.4 fps -6%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	25 fps -11%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	24.9 fps -11%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	21.7 fps -23%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	21.4 fps -24%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	21.2 fps -25%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21.1 fps -25%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.5 fps -27%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	20.4 fps -27%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	19.5 fps -31%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	18.2 fps -35%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	13.9 fps -51%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	9.07 fps -68%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	8.78 fps -69%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	59.3 s *
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	58.9 s * +1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (52.9 - 59.9, n=8)	56.7 s * +4%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	56.1 s * +5%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	54.8 s * +8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	54.3 s * +8%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	51 s * +14%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	50.1 s * +16%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	49.1 s * +17%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	48.9 s * +18%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	46.4 s * +22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	46.1 s * +22%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	44.1 s * +26%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	41.1 s * +31%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	40.8 s * +31%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	0.519 sec * -35%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	0.503 sec * -31%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H	0.4949 sec * -28%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4568 sec * -19%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	0.4468 sec * -16%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4413 sec * -15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4372 sec * -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4343 sec * -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4336 sec * -13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	0.4326 sec * -12%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	0.4239 sec * -10%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	0.4139 sec * -7%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	0.4198 sec * -9%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.411 sec * -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (0.3848 - 0.4157, n=8)	0.3988 sec * -3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	0.3854 sec *

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3607 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

247 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

322 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

9354 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

822 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2091 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

23997 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1206 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

121.8 Points

Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread

496 Points

Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi

5079 Points

Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Performance Rating
BOSGAME VTA-439 ^-1! AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	96.4 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	95.8 pt
GMK EVO-X1 ^-1! AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	86.2 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	82.2 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	78.3 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	66.7 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	58.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (31533 - 38491, n=13)	35097 KRay/s +3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	34100 KRay/s
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	31831 KRay/s -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	26120 KRay/s -23%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	23948 KRay/s -30%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	18930 KRay/s -44%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	14919 KRay/s -56%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (117908 - 152422, n=13)	137916 Points 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	137653 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	123834 Points -10%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	115042 Points -16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	106590 Points -23%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	95675 Points -30%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	77104 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	5482 MB/s +3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (5033 - 5821, n=13)	5427 MB/s +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	5313 MB/s
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	5273 MB/s -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	4764 MB/s -10%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	4397 MB/s -17%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	3907 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	115748 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (89114 - 100451, n=6)	95585 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	67363 Points
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	53557 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	41991 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	18758 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (17575 - 19320, n=13)	18651 Points -1%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	18487 Points -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	15123 Points -19%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	8550 Points -54%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	8187 Points -56%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	6300 Points -66%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (65448 - 78045, n=13)	71910 Points +7%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	66899 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	65772 Points -2%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	60319 Points -10%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	57378 Points -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	50451 Points -25%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	41337 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	86090 MB/s +6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (77849 - 117375, n=13)	85706 MB/s +6%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	80897 MB/s
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	78003 MB/s -4%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	74042 MB/s -8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	64670 MB/s -20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	58549 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (1305 - 1549, n=13)	1458 MB/s +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	1434 MB/s
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	1332 MB/s -7%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	1271 MB/s -11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	1066 MB/s -26%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	1057 MB/s -26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	1034 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (16524 - 20313, n=13)	18648 KRay/s +4%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	17949 KRay/s
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	17458 KRay/s -3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	13941 KRay/s -22%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	12696 KRay/s -29%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	10447 KRay/s -42%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	7552 KRay/s -58%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	55590 MPixel/s +13%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T (v6.92.6600)	54590 MPixel/s +11%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	54042 MPixel/s +10%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	49148 MPixel/s
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M (v6.92.6600)	48893 MPixel/s -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M (v6.92.6600)	41649 MPixel/s -15%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (23851 - 54302, n=13)	40414 MPixel/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (7672 - 8080, n=7)	7832 MP/s 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M (v8.20.8100)	7819 MP/s
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL (v8.20.8100)	4051 MP/s -48%

Systemleistung

Performance Rating
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	85.4 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	83.9 pt
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	83.8 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	82.3 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.1 pt
GMK EVO-X1 ^-3! Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	77.8 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	77.2 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	8791 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (7221 - 9105, n=7)	8577 Points -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	8325 Points -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	7492 Points -15%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7341 Points -16%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	7196 Points -18%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	6907 Points -21%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	11218 Points +7%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10861 Points +4%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	10491 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10377 Points -1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	10375 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (9704 - 10841, n=7)	10318 Points -2%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	10028 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	15282 Points +4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (9899 - 16696, n=7)	15131 Points +3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	14636 Points
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	9444 Points -35%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9325 Points -36%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9319 Points -36%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	8635 Points -41%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	12005 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	11679 Points -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (9999 - 12005, n=7)	11067 Points -8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	10773 Points -10%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10613 Points -12%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	9873 Points -18%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9243 Points -23%

CrossMark / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2085 Points +29%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	1978 Points +23%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1791 Points +11%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1771 Points +10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1371 - 1898, n=7)	1726 Points +7%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1686 Points +5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1611 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2032 Points +40%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	1886 Points +30%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1733 Points +20%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1637 Points +13%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1620 Points +12%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1212 - 1751, n=7)	1586 Points +9%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1449 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2216 Points +3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	2169 Points +1%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	2143 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	2115 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1689 - 2211, n=7)	2045 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1895 Points -12%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1817 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	1876 Points +99%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	1733 Points +84%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1666 Points +77%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1521 Points +61%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (942 - 1626, n=7)	1357 Points +44%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1314 Points +39%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	942 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	350 Points +14%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	332 Points +8%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (285 - 331, n=6)	311 Points +1%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	307 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	302 Points -2%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	300 Points -2%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	230 Points -25%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	321 Points +33%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	282 Points +17%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	265 Points +10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (238 - 279, n=7)	255 Points +6%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	245 Points +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	241 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	236 Points -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	566 ms * -34%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	473 ms * -12%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	456 ms * -8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	430 ms * -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (414 - 444, n=7)	429 ms * -1%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	425 ms * -0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	423 ms *

Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	6037 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5954 Points -1%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	5264 Points -13%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (3669 - 6060, n=7)	4997 Points -17%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	4803 Points -20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	4245 Points -30%

Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	13854 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	12303 Points -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (9482 - 14441, n=7)	12139 Points -12%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	11899 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	11370 Points -18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	9377 Points -32%

Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	8277 Points
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	7987 Points -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7966 Points -4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	7262 Points -12%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M (4877 - 8507, n=7)	6877 Points -17%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	6175 Points -25%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

PCMark 10 Score		8791 Punkte
Hilfe

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	88690 MB/s +18%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	84796 MB/s +13%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80559 MB/s +7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	75437 MB/s 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	75070 MB/s
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	74184 MB/s -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (38489 - 86767, n=13)	62588 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100086 MB/s +28%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	89837 MB/s +15%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	81021 MB/s +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	79808 MB/s +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	78342 MB/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (39901 - 93860, n=13)	67966 MB/s -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	58305 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	106026 MB/s +26%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	100538 MB/s +20%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	84220 MB/s 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	83992 MB/s
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80726 MB/s -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	75959 MB/s -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (40283 - 118364, n=13)	70854 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	116.9 ns * -12%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	108.8 ns * -4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	108.4 ns * -4%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	106.2 ns * -2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	104.5 ns *
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	103.9 ns * +1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (87.4 - 104.5, n=13)	92.7 ns * +11%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

DPC-Latenz

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	3050.8 μs * -172%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1120.8 μs *
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1006 μs * +10%
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	800.9 μs * +29%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	790.7 μs * +29%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Massenspeicher

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6104 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5144 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 351.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 371.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3636 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3362 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.28 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 159.4 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	81.6 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	68.2 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	67.4 pt
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	62.2 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	60.4 pt
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	53.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4684 (4668.68^min - 4684.06^max) MB/s +47%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	3186 (3144.68^min - 3186.33^max) MB/s
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	2908 (2840.99^min - 2907.7^max) MB/s -9%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2127 (2116.24^min - 2127.2^max) MB/s -33%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2112 (2077.27^min - 2111.8^max) MB/s -34%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1844 (796.16^min - 1843.9^max) MB/s -42%
seq write
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	3651 (3431.15^min - 3650.55^max) MB/s +10%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	3335 (698.84^min - 3334.89^max) MB/s 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	3331 (3192.28^min - 3331.16^max) MB/s
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	2678 (1205.44^min - 2677.64^max) MB/s -20%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2002 (508.14^min - 2001.92^max) MB/s -40%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1808 (844.51^min - 1808.37^max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	7106 (6492.57^min - 7105.99^max) MB/s +19%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	7027 (6531.58^min - 7026.93^max) MB/s +17%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	5990 (5485.31^min - 5990.1^max) MB/s
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	5885 (5026.66^min - 5885.03^max) MB/s -2%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4942 (4516.62^min - 4941.52^max) MB/s -17%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4634 (3709.78^min - 4633.62^max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	6409 (2562.3^min - 6408.9^max) MB/s +20%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	5321 (4879.54^min - 5320.63^max) MB/s
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	5283 (736.31^min - 5283.36^max) MB/s -1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	4978 (4946.97^min - 4977.91^max) MB/s -6%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2157 (1027.6^min - 2156.71^max) MB/s -59%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1803 (883.02^min - 1802.5^max) MB/s -66%
4k q1 t1 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	88.3 (87.81^min - 88.25^max) MB/s +69%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	63.5 (59.74^min - 63.47^max) MB/s +22%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	62.2 (60.58^min - 62.17^max) MB/s +19%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	52.1 (49.21^min - 52.06^max) MB/s
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.5 (49.98^min - 50.45^max) MB/s -3%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.4 (49.34^min - 50.36^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	297 (295.94^min - 296.5^max) MB/s +222%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	261 (259.05^min - 260.68^max) MB/s +183%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	257 (224.82^min - 257.36^max) MB/s +179%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	191.4 (187.69^min - 191.36^max) MB/s +108%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	130.4 (122.26^min - 130.43^max) MB/s +42%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	92.1 (87.46^min - 92.07^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4349 (4343.6^min - 4349.02^max) MB/s +558%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	781 (686.38^min - 780.77^max) MB/s +18%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	710 (651.38^min - 709.96^max) MB/s +7%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	696 (694.31^min - 696.03^max) MB/s +5%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	696 (692.86^min - 696.3^max) MB/s +5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	661 (631.61^min - 661.21^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1937 (1313.65^min - 1936.81^max) MB/s +392%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1780 (805.06^min - 1780.2^max) MB/s +352%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1771 (405.45^min - 1770.96^max) MB/s +349%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	413 (353.25^min - 412.63^max) MB/s +5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	394 (301.27^min - 394.3^max) MB/s
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	374 (371.04^min - 374.36^max) MB/s -5%

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	5647 Points +64%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	4673 Points +36%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4167 Points +21%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4085 Points +19%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3778 Points +10%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	3444 Points
Score Read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1915 Points +63%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	1396 Points +19%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1350 Points +15%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	1217 Points +3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1178 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1127 Points -4%
Score Write
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	3655 Points +110%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	2889 Points +66%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2214 Points +27%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2146 Points +23%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1744 Points
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1313 Points -25%
Seq Read
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	5114 MB/s +15%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	4492.91 MB/s +1%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	4432.66 MB/s
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3870.26 MB/s -13%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3870.22 MB/s -13%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	3811.12 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	3123.65 MB/s +18%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	2643.15 MB/s
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	2533 MB/s -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2185.55 MB/s -17%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1949.68 MB/s -26%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	980.9 MB/s -63%
4K Read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	80.76 MB/s +82%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	54.36 MB/s +22%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	53.9 MB/s +21%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	52.09 MB/s +17%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	48.85 MB/s +10%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	44.48 MB/s
4K Write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	263.64 MB/s +46%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	241.17 MB/s +33%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	219.87 MB/s +21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	212.46 MB/s +17%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	181.12 MB/s
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	152.4 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1453.09 MB/s +111%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	914.11 MB/s +32%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	831 MB/s +20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	713 MB/s +3%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	690.16 MB/s
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	688.04 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	3249 MB/s +150%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	2364.44 MB/s +82%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1777.93 MB/s +37%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1707.34 MB/s +31%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	1298.72 MB/s
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	951.67 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	0.105 ms * -4%
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	0.101 ms *
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	0.082 ms * +19%
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.053 ms * +48%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.049 ms * +51%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.042 ms * +58%
Access Time Write
BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00	0.308 ms *
GMK EVO-X1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.093 ms * +70%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.088 ms * +71%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.077 ms * +75%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J	0.053 ms * +83%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD	0.024 ms * +92%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

SSD-Drosselung: DiskSpd-Leseschleife, Warteschlangentiefe 8

BOSGAME VTA-439 Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5981 (5392.2-6003.36) MB/s

Beelink GTI15 Ultra ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4627 (4156.56-4864.26) MB/s

Grafikleistung

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	100 pt
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	67.1 pt
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	65.6 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	60.4 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M	60 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	58.8 pt
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	56.2 pt
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	55.4 pt
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	52.6 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	50.3 pt
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	47.1 pt
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	47 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	39.8 pt
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	22.2 pt
GMK NucBox M3 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i5-12450H	17.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	18261 Points +13%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	16131 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15739 Points -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (8947 - 17483, n=34)	14654 Points -9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	14312 Points -11%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13716 Points -15%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13673 Points -15%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13067 Points -19%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12659 Points -22%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	11080 Points -31%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	10381 Points -36%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	9619 Points -40%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	6917 Points -57%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	5584 Points -65%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i5-12450H	3906 Points -76%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	16560 Points +70%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	9760 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9666 Points -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	8875 Points -9%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8773 Points -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (5173 - 10037, n=34)	8727 Points -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8572 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8164 Points -16%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7985 Points -18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7696 Points -21%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	7601 Points -22%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	7054 Points -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	6665 Points -32%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	3528 Points -64%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i5-12450H	3131 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	6945 Points +85%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3940 Points +5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	3750 Points
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3634 Points -3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3312 Points -12%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (1918 - 3753, n=35)	3265 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3077 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	2943 Points -22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2917 Points -22%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2906 Points -23%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	2865 Points -24%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2795 Points -25%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	2632 Points -30%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	1014 Points -73%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i5-12450H	873 Points -77%

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		15485 Punkte
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40585 Punkte
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8937 Punkte
3DMark Time Spy Score		4163 Punkte
Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Blender
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	792 Seconds * -258%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i5-12450H	741 Seconds * -235%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	513 Seconds * -132%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	356 Seconds * -61%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	345 Seconds * -56%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	327 Seconds * -48%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	315 Seconds * -43%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	310 Seconds * -40%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	306 Seconds * -38%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	304 Seconds * -38%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	302 Seconds * -37%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	266 Seconds * -20%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (211 - 475, n=33)	265 Seconds * -20%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	242 Seconds * -10%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	221 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	255 Seconds *
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	252 Seconds *
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	169 Seconds *
v4.3 Barbershop CPU
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U	3879 Seconds * -227%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	2657 Seconds * -124%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1735 Seconds * -46%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	1709 Seconds * -44%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	1635 Seconds * -38%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1528 Seconds * -29%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	1507 Seconds * -27%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1498 Seconds * -26%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1349 Seconds * -14%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (1101 - 1532, n=17)	1249 Seconds * -5%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1240 Seconds * -5%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470	1186 Seconds *

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Performance Rating - Percent
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	99 pt
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	92.3 pt
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	86.1 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	83.9 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	74.9 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	72.1 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	28.2 (23.6^min, 22.7^P1) fps
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.6 (22^min, 21.1^P1) fps -9%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.1 (19.5^min, 13.6^P1) fps -11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps -20%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps -23%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	21.1 (18.1^min, 17.5^P1) fps -25%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	32.1 (28.2^min, 28.7^P0.1, 29.3^P1) fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.4 fps -12%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps -16%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26 (19.7^min, 19.8^P0.1, 23.2^P1) fps -19%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	22.8 (21.2^min, 21.2^P0.1, 21.3^P1) fps -29%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.3 (4.62^min, 22.7^P1) fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	31.8 (7.6^min, 22.7^P1) fps
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps -8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	20.4 (5.58^min, 15.9^P1) fps -36%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.5 (8.68^min, 14.9^P1) fps -42%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps -46%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	32.6 fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.3 fps -1%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.9 fps -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps -6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps -17%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	25.1 fps -23%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	58.4 (39^min, 45.2^P1) fps +4%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	56.2 (40.6^min, 46.2^P1) fps 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	56.1 (35.9^min, 44^P1) fps
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps -10%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	48.5 (33.7^min, 37.6^P1) fps -14%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	92.2 (50.4^min) fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	90.6 (79.1^min) fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	83.3 (74^min) fps -8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	79.9 (53.3^min) fps -12%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps -14%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	58.3 fps
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	48.3 fps -17%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	46.2 fps -21%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps -37%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps -39%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	28.6 fps -51%

Cyberpunk 2077
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	68.6 (58.3^min) fps +64%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	41.9 (36.6^min, 35.6^P1) fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	38.2 (32.9^min, 31.3^P1) fps -9%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (16.9 - 43.1, n=38)	36.1 fps -14%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.2 (10.9^min) fps -16%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.5 (29.8^min) fps -18%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (30.1^min, 28.2^P1) fps -18%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	33.7 (29.8^min, 29^P1) fps -20%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.6 (27.5^min) fps -27%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	30.2 (26.1^min, 24.6^P1) fps -28%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	29.5 (25.2^min) fps -30%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	28.4 (24.9^min, 23.9^P1) fps -32%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.7 (23.2^min, 22.4^P1) fps -36%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	9.9 (8.48^min) fps -76%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	57.8 (48.8^min) fps +83%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 (27.1^min, 26.1^P1) fps
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	29 (25.5^min, 24.8^P1) fps -8%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.7 (22.6^min, 14.6^P1) fps -9%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (13 - 33.4, n=38)	28.1 fps -11%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.7 (9.25^min) fps -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (22.6^min) fps -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.4 (22.9^min, 7.08^P1) fps -16%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.2 (21.4^min) fps -20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	24.5 (21.2^min, 20.5^P1) fps -22%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	23.8 (20.3^min, 19.7^P1) fps -25%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	23.7 (19.8^min, 18.6^P1) fps -25%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	22.8 (18.7^min) fps -28%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	8.37 (7.07^min) fps -74%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	50.6 (40.6^min) fps +79%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	28.2 (23.6^min, 22.7^P1) fps
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.6 (22^min, 21.1^P1) fps -9%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.1 (19.5^min, 13.6^P1) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (15 - 29.3, n=39)	24.8 fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 (9.31^min) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.4 (19^min) fps -17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps -20%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	21.9 (18.7^min) fps -22%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps -23%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	21.7 (17.5^min, 15.6^P1) fps -23%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	21.1 (18.1^min, 17.5^P1) fps -25%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	19 (15.5^min) fps -33%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	7 (5.89^min) fps -75%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	108.8 (13.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps +41%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	78.8 (6.79^min, 52.6^P1) fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	77 (10^min, 52.6^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (36.4 - 81.5, n=35)	71.9 fps -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	69.4 (9.45^min, 47.6^P1) fps -10%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	66.6 (10.3^min, 45.5^P1) fps -14%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.7 (3.85^min, 40^P1) fps -15%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	64.8 (10.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps -16%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	57.4 (6.55^min, 45.5^P1) fps -25%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	51.1 (6.55^min, 40^P1) fps -34%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	45.3 (15.1^min, 35.7^P1) fps -41%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	40.9 (6.4^min, 33.3^P1) fps -47%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	20.6 (4.68^min, 14.7^P1) fps -73%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	15 (10^min, 11.4^P1) fps -81%
1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	44.2 (11.9^min, 33.3^P1) fps +39%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.3 (4.62^min, 22.7^P1) fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	31.8 (7.6^min, 22.7^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (14.4 - 34.7, n=35)	30.2 fps -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps -8%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	27.5 (6.16^min, 19.2^P1) fps -14%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26 (2.62^min, 17.5^P1) fps -18%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26 (4.11^min, 18.2^P1) fps -18%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	22.8 (5.12^min, 17.5^P1) fps -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	20.4 (5.58^min, 15.9^P1) fps -36%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.5 (8.68^min, 14.9^P1) fps -42%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps -46%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	9.2 (1.853^min, 6.49^P1) fps -71%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	6.32 (3.91^min, 4.98^P1) fps -80%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	104 (71.4^min) fps +1%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	103 (90.1^min) fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	98.8 (80.5^min) fps -4%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	96.8 (17.4^min) fps -6%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	93.4 (82.2^min) fps -9%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	91 (80.5^min) fps -12%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	90 (79^min) fps -13%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	90 (76.5^min) fps -13%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	87.6 (52.1^min) fps -15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	82.6 (47.5^min) fps -20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	81.2 (53.8^min) fps -21%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (34.8 - 104.4, n=39)	77.2 fps -25%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	68.9 (35.5^min) fps -33%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	50.7 (44^min) fps -51%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	35.4 (33.8^min) fps -66%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	101.5 (72.2^min) fps +12%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	92.2 (50.4^min) fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	90.6 (79.1^min) fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	90.4 (71.8^min) fps 0%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.4 (16.1^min) fps -4%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	83.9 (75.6^min) fps -7%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	83.3 (74^min) fps -8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	79.9 (53.3^min) fps -12%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	79.7 (71.6^min) fps -12%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	78.5 (50.7^min) fps -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps -14%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (32.4 - 93, n=39)	69.4 fps -23%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	47.1 (41.6^min) fps -48%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	34.7 (32.5^min) fps -62%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	45.6 fps +2%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	44.9 fps
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	43.6 fps -3%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	42.8 fps -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	42.3 fps -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (23.7 - 48.4, n=35)	41.3 fps -8%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	40.2 fps -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.3 fps -12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	38.9 fps -13%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	36.4 fps -19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	34.6 fps -23%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.6 fps -27%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	17.2 fps -62%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	14.8 fps -67%
1920x1080 High Quality
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	32.6 fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.3 fps -1%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.9 fps -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (17.7 - 34.9, n=36)	29.8 fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.3 fps -10%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.5 fps -13%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps -17%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	25.6 fps -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	25.1 fps -23%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.8 fps -27%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	11.8 fps -64%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	10.6 fps -67%

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	71.1 fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	62.4 fps -12%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	61.9 fps -13%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (40.8 - 76.4, n=35)	59.4 fps -16%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	55.7 fps -22%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	50.3 fps -29%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.8 fps -33%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.3 fps -33%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45.7 fps -36%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	44.5 fps -37%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	39.2 fps -45%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	33.2 fps -53%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.4 fps -60%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	25.7 fps -64%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	23.8 fps -67%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	58.3 fps
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	50.2 fps -14%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	48.3 fps -17%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (33.7 - 58.3, n=35)	46.4 fps -20%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	46.2 fps -21%
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	41.7 fps -28%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.7 fps -32%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps -32%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.4 fps -32%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps -37%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps -39%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	28.6 fps -51%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	23.3 fps -60%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	22.2 fps -62%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	22 fps -62%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	116.7 (48.5^min, 93.3^P1) fps +79%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	68.6 (49.2^min, 53^P1) fps +5%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	67 (48.2^min, 55^P1) fps +3%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	65.8 (43.1^min, 52.8^P1) fps +1%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	65.3 (46.4^min, 49.5^P1) fps
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	62.6 (43.8^min, 48.8^P1) fps -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (29.9 - 70.9, n=29)	62.3 fps -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	60.9 (45.8^min, 48.3^P1) fps -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	58.7 (43.2^min, 45.6^P1) fps -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	57.9 (7^min, 45^P1) fps -11%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	56.9 (38.5^min, 45.8^P1) fps -13%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	50.7 (36.2^min, 38.8^P1) fps -22%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	20 (5^min, 6.58^P1) fps -69%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	101.4 (59.5^min, 78.8^P1) fps +81%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	58.4 (39^min, 45.2^P1) fps +4%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	56.2 (40.6^min, 46.2^P1) fps 0%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	56.1 (35.9^min, 44^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	54.5 (14.8^min, 22.5^P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (26 - 60, n=29)	53.1 fps -5%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	50.8 (24.5^min, 33.9^P1) fps -9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.8 (11.1^min, 31.1^P1) fps -13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	48.5 (33.7^min, 37.6^P1) fps -14%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	42.8 (28.6^min, 33.1^P1) fps -24%
GMK NucBox M3 Intel Core i5-12450H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	17.7 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -68%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	42.7 (36.1^min, 36.7^P0.1, 39.1^P1) fps +33%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	32.2 (29.3^min, 29.3^P0.1, 29.8^P1) fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.9 fps -10%
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.6 fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (16.9 - 33.2, n=39)	28.6 fps -11%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.1 fps -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps -16%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.5 (23.4^min, 23.5^P0.1, 24.9^P1) fps -18%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.3 (21.5^min, 21.7^P0.1, 22.5^P1) fps -18%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.2 (21.4^min, 21.4^P0.1, 23.3^P1) fps -19%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.7 (23.3^min, 23.5^P0.1, 23.8^P1) fps -20%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	23.1 (21.2^min, 21.2^P0.1, 21.3^P1) fps -28%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	21.6 (18.7^min, 19^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps -33%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	8.18 (1.909^min, 2.43^P0.1, 6.14^P1) fps -75%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	42.3 (37.3^min, 37.4^P0.1, 38.5^P1) fps +32%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	32.1 (28.2^min, 28.7^P0.1, 29.3^P1) fps
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.4 fps -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28 fps -13%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (16.8 - 32.7, n=38)	27.8 fps -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps -16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps -16%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26 (21.8^min, 22^P0.1, 23.5^P1) fps -19%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26 (19.7^min, 19.8^P0.1, 23.2^P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	25.8 (22.3^min, 22.3^P0.1, 22.9^P1) fps -20%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	22.8 (21.2^min, 21.2^P0.1, 21.3^P1) fps -29%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	21.3 (16.9^min, 17.5^P0.1, 18.6^P1) fps -34%

F1 24
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	147.7 (128^min, 104^P1) fps +68%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	87.8 (72^min, 65^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	78.4 (53^min, 55^P1) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (43.9 - 95.2, n=26)	76.8 fps -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	75.6 (53^min, 50^P1) fps -14%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	74.9 (65^min, 61^P1) fps -15%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	73.3 (59^min, 44^P1) fps -17%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	72.8 (63^min, 61^P1) fps -17%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	66 (54^min, 47^P1) fps -25%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	61.5 (53^min, 52^P1) fps -30%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	23.1 (17^min, 15^P1) fps -74%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	109.6 (95^min, 77^P1) fps +68%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	65.1 (55^min, 49^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	58.7 (34^min, 45^P1) fps -10%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	57.7 (51^min, 49^P1) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (31.1 - 71.6, n=26)	56.3 fps -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	55.8 (41^min, 40^P1) fps -14%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	54.1 (43^min, 36^P1) fps -17%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	53.8 (46^min, 46^P1) fps -17%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	48.2 (41^min, 35^P1) fps -26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	45.8 (39^min, 38^P1) fps -30%
Geekom A5 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	16.8 (11^min, 11^P1) fps -74%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Khadas Mind Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	38.4 (32^min, 30^P1) fps +149%
Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	19.2 (16^min, 16^P1) fps +25%
GMK NucBox K13 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	17.2 (13^min, 12^P1) fps +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (14^min, 14^P1) fps +11%
BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M	15.4 (11^min, 11^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (8.41 - 18.4, n=22)	14.4 fps -6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU	14.2 (11^min, 11^P1) fps -8%
Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	13.5 (8^min, 8^P1) fps -12%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	13 (5^min, 9^P1) fps -16%
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M	11.4 (8^min, 7^P1) fps -26%

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra: FPS-Diagramm

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M: Ø26.3 (24.6-26.9) fps

	min.	mittel	hoch	max.
GTA V (2015)	174.4	168.3	77	31.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	182.3	142.7	103	90.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	90.4	44.9	32.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	92.6	71.1	58.3
Strange Brigade (2018)	190.8	76.8	65.3	56.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	48.4	40.2	32.2	32.1
Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)	52.6	41.9	31.6	28.2
F1 24 (2024)	98.5	87.8	65.1	15.4

Emissionen

Geräuschemissionen

Lüftergeräuschprofil (Weiß: Hintergrund, Rot: System im Leerlauf, Blau: 3DMark 06, Orange: Cyberpunk 2077, Grün: Prime95-Stress)

Lautstärkediagramm

Idle		25.7 / 25.8 / 25.8 dB(A)
Last		44.4 / 47.8 dB(A)

	30 dB leise 40 dB(A) deutlich hörbar 50 dB(A) störend
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (aus 15 cm gemessen) Umgebungsgeräusche: 23.1 dB(A)

	BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL	Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T
Geräuschentwicklung		8%	3%	-6%	-7%	-9%
aus / Umgebung * (dB)	23.1	22.4 3%	23 -0%	23.3 -1%	23.6 -2%	25.3 -10%
Idle min * (dB)	25.7	27.9 -9%	29.1 -13%	27.8 -8%	28 -9%	25.4 1%
Idle avg * (dB)	25.8	27.9 -8%	30.1 -17%	30.3 -17%	33.2 -29%	25.5 1%
Idle max * (dB)	25.8	30.2 -17%	31.7 -23%	30.4 -18%	33.5 -30%	37.3 -45%
Last avg * (dB)	44.4	31.3 30%	33.7 24%	44.6 -0%	39.1 12%	44.4 -0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	44.8	32.1 28%	33.8 25%	44.2 1%	44.4 1%	46.2 -3%
Last max * (dB)	47.8	32.5 32%	35.2 26%	46.1 4%	45.2 5%	52.7 -10%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)						47.7

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Temperatur

Frischluft strömt von oben ein, während die warme Abluft auf der Rückseite austritt. Das relativ kleine 120-W-Netzteil (ca. 7 x 7 x 3,1 cm) erreicht bei anspruchsvoller Belastung über 43 °C.

Max. Last

Idle


31.4 °C	31.6 °C	31.2 °C
30.4 °C	28.6 °C	30.8 °C
30.4 °C	30.8 °C	31 °C

Maximal: 31.6 °C
Durchschnitt: 30.7 °C


31.2 °C	30.8 °C	33.2 °C
27.8 °C	28 °C	33.4 °C
29.8 °C	28.2 °C	28.8 °C

Maximal: 33.4 °C
Durchschnitt: 30.1 °C

Netzteil (max.) 43.2 °C | Raumtemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) Die Durchschnittstemperatur auf der Oberseite unter extremer Last ist 30.7 °C. Im Vergleich erhitzte sich der Durchschnitt der Geräteklasse Mini PC auf 32.1 °C.
(+) Die maximale Temperatur auf der Oberseite ist 31.6 °C. Im Vergleich liegt der Klassendurchschnitt bei 35.2 °C (von 20.6 bis 69.5 °C für die Klasse Mini PC).
(+) Auf der Unterseite messen wir eine maximalen Wert von 33.4 °C (im Vergleich zum Durchschnitt von 35.9 °C).
(+) Ohne Last messen wir eine durchschnittliche Temperatur von 28.4 °C auf der Oberseite. Der Klassendurchschnitt erreicht 32.1 °C.

Prime95- und FurMark-Stress (Vorderseite)

Stresstest

	Durchschnittlicher CPU-Takt (GHz)	GPU-Takt (MHz)	Durchschnittliche CPU-Temperatur (°C)
System im Leerlauf	--	--	36
Prime95-Stress	3,2	733	88
Prime95- und FurMark-Stress	3,5	2696	88
Cyberpunk-2077-Stress	0,8	3092	78

Energieverwaltung

Stromverbrauch

Beim Start der Prime95-Belastung stieg der Verbrauch auf 103 W, bevor er sank und sich nach etwa 10 Sekunden bei 104 W stabilisierte. Dies zeigt, dass der Turbo Boost nur begrenzt aufrechterhalten werden kann.

Prime95- und FurMark-Belastung ab der 10. Sekunde. Das System kann die volle Leistung des 120-W-Netzteils zumindest vorübergehend nutzen.

Stromverbrauch

Aus / Standby	0.59 / 1.8 Watt
Idle	7 / 7.5 / 9 Watt
Last	90.7 / 120.9 Watt


Legende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M, Kingston OM8TAP41024K1-A00, , x,	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, , , x,	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J, , x,	Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD, , x,
Stromverbrauch		-99%	18%	28%	23%	19%
Idle min * (Watt)	7	18.8 -169%	7 -0%	5.4 23%	6.2 11%	3.9 44%
Idle avg * (Watt)	7.5	20.1 -168%	7.1 5%	5.8 23%	7.9 -5%	6.1 19%
Idle max * (Watt)	9	40.1 -346%	7.5 17%	5.8 36%	8.5 6%	8.2 9%
Last avg * (Watt)	90.7	66.2 27%	62.3 31%	72.1 21%	41.4 54%	56.1 38%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	101.2	72.4 28%	80.1 21%	72.5 28%	47.6 53%	63.9 37%
Last max * (Watt)	120.9	82.4 32%	82.9 31%	76.1 37%	98 19%	160.6 -33%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Stromverbrauch bei Cyberpunk 2077 und im Stresstest

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M: Ø106.4 (102.1-120.9) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø75.9 (74.5-76.3) Watt

Stromverbrauch mit externem Monitor

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø105.7 (103-118.3) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø74.9 (74.4-84.4) Watt

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø111.4 (104.3-114) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.1 (49.8-71.8) Watt

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø101.3 (96-111.3) Watt

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.6 (79.1-92.8) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø65.3 (62.6-74.6) Watt

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.16 (6.84-9.26) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.36 (4.94-8.44) Watt

BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø101.2 (100.5-103.2) Watt

GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø72.5 (71.1-74.2) Watt

Notebookcheck-Bewertung

Ein professioneller Mini-PC, der auf SSD- und RAM-Upgrades ausgelegt ist, dafür aber auf übliche HTPC-Funktionen wie Lautsprecher und Mikrofone verzichtet.

Zurück zum Fazit

BOSGAME VTA-439 - 23.06.2026 v8
Allen Ngo

Gehäuse

83 / 98 → 85%

Konnektivität

68 / 81 → 84%

Gewicht

79 / 10-100 → 76%

Leistung Spiele

57 / 80 → 71%

Leistung Anwendungen

86 / 92 → 93%

AI Performance

90%

Temperatur

93%

Lautstärke

82%

Durchschnitt

69%

81%

Mini PC - gewichteter Durchschnitt

Weitere Informationen über unsere Bewertung finden Sie hier.

CO2 Emissions
100%

Materials
0%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
72.9%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 55.9%

Mögliche Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Bild	Modell / Test	Preis ab	Gewicht	Dicke	Display
1. 81.1%	BOSGAME VTA-439 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis: 1050 USD	764 g	50 mm	x
2. 83.7%	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB RAM	Bestpreis 1903.35€ Proshop.de 2. 1989.34€ galaxus 3. 2002.01€ Proshop.at1200 USD	1.3 kg	55.8 mm	x
3. 80.2%	Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 520 USD Geizhals Suche	812 g	44.7 mm	x
4. 72%	GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis: 900 USD	595 g	63.2 mm	x
5. 76.9%	MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1000 GB SSD	Bestpreis 1359€ galaxus 2. 1399€ galaxus.at 3. 1785.99€ NordElettronics830 USD	552 g	37.5 mm	x
6. 77.5%	Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Bestpreis 574.83€ electronis.de 2. 574.84€ Easynotebooks.de 3. 574.85€ Notebook.de991€	690 g	42 mm	x

Transparenz

Die Auswahl der zu testenden Geräte erfolgt innerhalb der Redaktion. Das vorliegende Testmuster wurde dem Autor vom Hersteller oder einem Shop zu Testzwecken leihweise zur Verfügung gestellt. Eine Einflussnahme des Leihstellers auf den Testbericht gab es nicht, der Hersteller erhielt keine Version des Reviews vor der Veröffentlichung. Es bestand keine Verpflichtung zur Publikation. Als eigenständiges, unabhängiges Unternehmen unterliegt Notebookcheck keiner Diktion von Herstellern, Shops und Verlagen.

So testet Notebookcheck

Pro Jahr werden von Notebookcheck hunderte Laptops und Smartphones unabhängig in von uns standardisierten technischen Verfahren getestet, um eine Vergleichbarkeit aller Testergebnisse zu gewährleisten. Seit rund 20 Jahren entwickeln wir diese Testmethoden kontinuierlich weiter und setzen damit Branchenstandards. In unseren Testlaboren kommt ausschließlich hochwertiges Messequipment in die Hände erfahrener Techniker und Redakteure. Die Tests unterliegen einer mehrstufigen Kontrolle. Unsere komplexe Gesamtbewertung basiert auf hunderten fundierten Messergebnissen und Benchmarks, womit Ihnen Objektivität garantiert ist. Weitere Informationen zu unseren Testmethoden gibt es hier.

Als bevorzugte Quelle auf Google hinzufügen

Loading Comments

Diesen Artikel kommentieren / Antworten

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core im Vergleich
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X Ryzen 7 9700X, GeForce RTX 4090	1203
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1204
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407 X2E-88-100, X2-90	1206
BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	1206
Tuxedo Infinity Book Pro 14 Gen10 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1207
Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop	1210
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1213
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

Bosgame VTA-439 im Test: Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 passt hervorragend in Mini-PCs

Viel Speicherplatz und Leistung.

Fazit – mehr Größe, mehr Funktionen

Pro

Contra

Preis und Verfügbarkeit

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Technische Daten

Gehäuse

Größenvergleich

Ausstattung

Kommunikation

Wartung

Leistung

Testbedingungen

Prozessorleistung

Cinebench R15 Multi-Dauertest

Systemleistung

DPC-Latenz

Massenspeicher

SSD-Drosselung: DiskSpd-Leseschleife, Warteschlangentiefe 8

Grafikleistung

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra: FPS-Diagramm

Emissionen

Geräuschemissionen

Temperatur

Stresstest

Energieverwaltung

Stromverbrauch

Stromverbrauch bei Cyberpunk 2077 und im Stresstest

Stromverbrauch mit externem Monitor

Notebookcheck-Bewertung

Mögliche Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Transparenz

Weitere Artikel zur Serie

Verwandte Artikel

3DMark 11 im Vergleich
Medion Akoya E1232T-MD99410 (min) N2807, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	143
...
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M	15443
Asus GX700 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)	15462
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15479
BOSGAME VTA-439 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M	15485
Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15486
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15492
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15502
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642