Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs Mediatek MT6750

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in July.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5600 MT/s, ECC memory included - this too depends on the motherboard.

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the 9700X is set to have multi-thread performance matching the fastest laptop chips such as the 24-core Core i9-13950HX. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9700X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with a 4 nm TSMC process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 65 W. It'll probably consume at least 100 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

Mediatek MT6750

► remove from comparison  MT6750

Der Mediatek MT6750 ist ein im 2. Quartal 2016 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der oberen Mittelklasse, der sowohl in Smartphones als auch Tablets (hauptsächlich Android) eingesetzt werden kann. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über acht CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur. Die 4 Kerne im Performance Cluster takten mit maximal 1.5 GHz, die 4 Kerne im Stromsparcluster mit maximal 1 GHz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem sowie sowie WLAN (802.11n) und Bluetooth.

Prozessor

Der Cortex-A53 kann als Nachfolger des beliebten Cortex-A7-Designs betrachtet werden. Neben der von 32 auf 64 Bit verbreiterten Prozessorarchitektur (ARMv8-ISA), die unter anderem die Adressierung von mehr als 4 GB Arbeitsspeicher erlaubt, wurden auch weitere Details wie die Sprungvorhersage optimiert. Insgesamt steigt die Pro-MHz-Leistung dadurch deutlich an und liegt sogar etwas oberhalb eines Cortex-A9-Kernes. Die acht Kerne des MT6750 takten mit bis zu 1 - 1,5 GHz, sodass sich der SoC etwas unter des Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 (8x Cortex-A53, 1,7 GHz) platziert. Bei voller Auslastung aller acht Kerne würde die Leistung sogar im High-End-Bereich liegen, doch ist in der Praxis kaum derart gut parallelisierte Software anzutreffen.

Grafikeinheit

Als Grafikeinheit kommt im Vergleich zum MT6753 bereits die neuer ARM Mali-T860 MP2 mit 520 MHz zum Einsatz. Übliche Android-Spiele werden auf Displays mittlerer bis höherer Auflösung (max. unterstützt: 1080p) zumeist flüssig wiedergegeben.

Features

Neben CPU und Grafikeinheit integriert der Chip auch einen Speichercontroller sowie ein Mobilfunkmodem (Cat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE), WLAN nach 802.11n und Bluetooth. Die integrierte Videoengine bewältigt 1080p-Videos bei 30 fps (Aufnahme und Wiedergabe), Kameras werden bis zu einer Auflösung von 16 Megapixeln unterstützt.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der MT6750 wird in 28-Nanometer-Technik gefertigt und sollte unter Last eine mittlere Leistungsaufnahme aufweisen. Damit ist der Chip auch für kompakte Smartphones geeignet.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9700XMediatek MT6750
CodenameGranite RidgeCortex-A53
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 « 1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock3800 - 5500 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 8
TDP65 Watt
Technology4 nm & 6 nm28 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ACat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2 ( - 530 MHz)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1203 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20485 Points (19%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2211 Points (90%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
870 Points (95%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7956 Points (19%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
346 Points (96%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9457 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57914 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108170 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17765 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
59.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13549 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
82553 MIPS (47%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7894 MIPS (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
26.4 fps (46%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
244 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
154 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18794 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
30757 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 9078     avg: 9342     median: 9341.5 (8%)     max: 9605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 8965     avg: 9227     median: 9227 (7%)     max: 9489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38088 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14306 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3373 Points (78%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
16817 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2507 Points (84%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14613 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2402 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14698 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9801 Points (98%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
59594 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6750 +
651 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6750 +
1849 Points (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
383 ms (0%)
min: 11708     avg: 14563     median: 13763 (16%)     max: 22627 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT6750 +
2042 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 1994     avg: 3095     median: 3200 (2%)     max: 3506 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
346 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
398 Points (71%)
19 Points (3%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 52278     avg: 54391     median: 54413 (10%)     max: 56639 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 75193     avg: 75778     median: 75778 (10%)     max: 76363 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 1430     avg: 1580     median: 1568.5 (8%)     max: 1754 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6750 +
min: 2451     avg: 2933     median: 2917 (6%)     max: 3445 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2174 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
180.2 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
174.6 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750 → 5% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 29. 01:19:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8490 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766967540s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Dec 2025 05:18:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8490 +0s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 8490 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)