Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T606 vs Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

UNISOC T606

► remove from comparison  T606

Der Unisoc T606 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

► remove from comparison  Helio P35 MT6765

Der Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 ist ein in Ende 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Octacore für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 8 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne in zwei Clustern. Die vier Kerne im Performance Cluster takten mit bis zu 2,3 GHz, die im Effizienz-Cluster mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Die Die Cores können dank Heterogeneous Multi-Processing bzw. big.LITTLE auch alle gemeinsam genutzt werden. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8320 welche mit 680 MHz getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

ModelUNISOC T606Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 « 1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1600 MHz1800 - 2300 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPPowerVR GE8320 680MHz, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)PowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P35 MT6765
0.3 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T606 +
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 T606 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 T606 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 165     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 176 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 915     avg: 983     median: 1002 (3%)     max: 1031 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 776     avg: 851     median: 855 (9%)     max: 921 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3834     avg: 4013     median: 3973 (4%)     max: 4232 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
790 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3542 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3904 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
841 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
888 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2700 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
6455 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3586 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4143 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T606 +
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
min: 9756     avg: 10649     median: 10849 (13%)     max: 11323 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T606 +
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (11%)     max: 13455 Points
min: 4347     avg: 4747     median: 4643 (4%)     max: 5543 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T606 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T606 +
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (16%)     max: 86 Points
min: 29     avg: 32     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 36 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
62996 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7343 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24869 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
12838 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
40692 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
85742 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T606 +
155928 Points (15%)
min: 101535     avg: 105631     median: 105734 (10%)     max: 109518 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 17134     avg: 23682     median: 24259.5 (20%)     max: 29075 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 19601     avg: 26565     median: 26896 (22%)     max: 32868 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 5938     avg: 10313     median: 10175.5 (2%)     max: 14962 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 42692     avg: 45071     median: 45483 (16%)     max: 46624 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
T606 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
117053 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
T606 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
37871 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
T606 +
1218 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T606 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
5059 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
T606 +
4923 Points (26%)
min: 2238     avg: 3957     median: 3956.5 (21%)     max: 5675 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
T606 +
10422 Points (22%)
min: 1780     avg: 4353     median: 4353 (9%)     max: 6926 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T606 +
7100 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
603 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4040     avg: 5969     median: 6001 (30%)     max: 7753 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T606 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T606 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
2.3 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T606 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt
1.1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T606 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 → 56% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 01:26:43

#0 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11371 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.06s ... 0.061s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.004s ... 0.064s

#7 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.057s ... 0.122s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11371 +0.017s ... 0.139s

#9 got single benchmarks 11371 +0.054s ... 0.193s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.193s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.166s ... 0.359s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.41s

#13 return log +0.053s ... 0.463s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)