Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU vs. GU502LW: Wo liegen die Unterschiede?

Turbo-Modus und Performance-Modus. Im Turbo-Modus zeigt sich Unterschied, zumindest wenn man es auf die beste Leistung abgesehen hat. Wir schauen uns an, was Nutzer von Asus' Mittelklasse-Gaming-Serie erwarten können.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (übersetzt von Christian Hintze), 14.10.2020 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Testgerät zur Verfügung gestellt von Intel

Download der lizensierten Bewertungsgrafik als PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 (ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502 Serie)

Prozessor

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz (Intel Comet Lake)

Grafikkarte

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6144 MB, Kerntakt: 1455 MHz, Speichertakt: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 456.55, Optimus

Hauptspeicher

16384 MB

, 8 GB soldered + 8 GB DDR4-3200 SODIMM slot, Dual-Channel

Bildschirm

15.60 Zoll 16:9, 1920 x 1080 Pixel 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, NCP004D, spiegelnd: nein, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Massenspeicher

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB

Soundkarte

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Anschlüsse

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Anschlüsse: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headphones

Netzwerk

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1

Abmessungen

Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 18.9 x 360 x 252

Akku

76 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Betriebssystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Sonstiges

Tastatur: Chiclet, Tastatur-Beleuchtung: ja, Armoury Crate, 12 Monate Garantie

Gewicht

2.045 kg, Netzteil: 722 g

Preis

1400 USD

Links

Asus Startseite
Asus Notebooks Übersichtseite

Hinweis: Der Hersteller kann abweichende Bauteile wie Bildschirme, Laufwerke und Speicherriegel mit ähnlichen Spezifikationen unter dem gleichen Modellnamen einsetzen.

Vollständige Spezifikationen anzeigen

[+] Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

» vergleiche

Bew.	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Dicke	Größe	Auflösung
82 %	10.2020	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	09.2020	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
82 %	09.2020	HP Omen 15-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.1 kg	32 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82 %	12.2020	Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	07.2020	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.5 kg	26.1 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	06.2020	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	27.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

RGB-Beleuchtung pro Taste ist nur bei ausgewählten Konfigurationen verfügbar. Unser GU502LU ist stattdessen mit Einzelzonen-RGB-Beleuchtung ausgestattet.

HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L ❌

Kommunikation

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1427 (808^min - 1646^max) MBit/s ∼100% +68%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1166 (600^min - 1337^max) MBit/s ∼82% +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1130 MBit/s ∼79% +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	849 (573^min - 993^max) MBit/s ∼59%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	610 (562^min - 651^max) MBit/s ∼43% -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	566 (37^min - 647^max) MBit/s ∼40% -33%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1450 (738^min - 1579^max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1370 MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1370 (1305^min - 1430^max) MBit/s ∼94%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1314 (949^min - 1439^max) MBit/s ∼91% -4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	905 (709^min - 946^max) MBit/s ∼62% -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	880 (772^min - 916^max) MBit/s ∼61% -36%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1369 (1305-1430)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø849 (573-993)

Display

Während das GU502LW mit einem 60-Hz-4K-Panel ausgestattet ist, kommt das weniger teure GU502LU mit einem 144-Hz-1080p-Panel daher. Das Hauptproblem des Panda-Panels (LM156LF-2F01) ist, dass es im Gegensatz zu vielen LG- oder Philips-Panels nur sehr langsame Reaktionszeiten bietet und auch noch unter sichtbarem Ghosting leidet, was es für schnelle Actionspiele eher ungeeignet erscheinen lässt. Aber auch die anderen Werte wie Farben, Kontrast und Helligkeit sind eher schwach bis mittelmäßig, wie wir es mittlerweile leider von einem Panda-Panel erwarten.

Das Subpixelraster ist durch die matte Oberfläche etwas körnig

Minimales bis leichtes Backlight Bleeding entlang der Kanten und Ecken


270.4 cd/m²	264.9 cd/m²	262.3 cd/m²
251.5 cd/m²	282.5 cd/m²	244.2 cd/m²
252.1 cd/m²	264.7 cd/m²	248 cd/m²

Ausleuchtung des Bildschirms

Panda LM156LF-2F01

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximal: 282.5 cd/m² Durchschnitt: 260.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15.29 cd/m²
Ausleuchtung: 86 %
Helligkeit Akku: 282.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 831:1 (Schwarzwert: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 4.75
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.08% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.32% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14

Download ICC Datei (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160	HP Omen 15-ek0456ng LGD05FE, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK BOE NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		72%		0%	-1%	60%
Display P3 Coverage	39.32	69.38 76%		39.86 1%	38.8 -1%	63.49 61%
sRGB Coverage	59.08	99 68%		58.37 -1%	57.76 -2%	94.42 60%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.65	70.5 73%		41.18 1%	40.09 -1%	65.05 60%
Response Times		-66%	46%	-15%	17%	57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	26 (11.2, 14.8)	60 (29.2, 30.8) -131%	17 (9, 8) 35%	38.4 (18.8, 19.6) -48%	26 (12, 14) -0%	10.4 (6.4, 4) 60%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 (14.8, 10.8)	25.6 (11.6, 14) -0%	11 (7, 4) 57%	20.8 (10.8, 10) 19%	17 (8, 9) 34%	12 (6.8, 5.2) 53%
PWM Frequency
Bildschirm		59%	30%	-16%	4%	21%
Helligkeit Bildmitte	282.5	387 37%	314 11%	296.3 5%	301 7%	384.9 36%
Brightness	260	377 45%	293 13%	284 9%	277 7%	358 38%
Brightness Distribution	86	90 5%	87 1%	84 -2%	77 -10%	87 1%
Schwarzwert *	0.34	0.23 32%	0.22 35%	0.38 -12%	0.26 24%	0.67 -97%
Kontrast	831	1683 103%	1427 72%	780 -6%	1158 39%	574 -31%
DeltaE Colorchecker *	4.89	1.8 63%	2.51 49%	6.56 -34%	5.12 -5%	2.43 50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	17.46	3.94 77%	4.42 75%	21.81 -25%	8.86 49%	4.58 74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	4.75	0.7 85%	1.71 64%	5.34 -12%	4.88 -3%	2.03 57%
DeltaE Graustufen *	2.2	2.9 -32%	3.26 -48%	4.4 -100%	3.47 -58%	2.6 -18%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.178 ^101%	2.42 ^91%	2.22 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6850 ^95%	6992 ^93%	6150 ^106%	6716 ^97%	7062 ^92%	6981 ^93%
Farbraum (Prozent von AdobeRGB 1998)	37.2	99 166%		37.3 0%	37 -1%	59.7 60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58.5	99 69%		57.6 -2%	57 -3%	93.9 61%
Durchschnitt gesamt (Programm / Settings)		22% / 46%	38% / 33%	-10% / -13%	7% / 5%	46% / 33%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Mit Ausnahme der schwachen Farbraumabdeckung (nur 59 Prozent sRGB) ist das Display ab Werk recht gut kalibriert. Die Farbgenauigkeit bleibt unter höherer Sättigung suboptimal.

Reaktionszeiten (Response Times) des Displays

ℹ

Die Reaktionszeiten (Response Times) beschreiben wie schnell zwischen zwei Farben eines Pixels umgeschaltet werden kann. Langsame Response Times können zu einer verschwommenen Darstellung, Schlieren und Geisterbilder führen. Besonders bei schnellen 3D-Spielen sind kurze Umschaltzeiten wichtig.

↔ Reaktionszeiten Schwarz zu Weiß
25.6 ms ... steigend ↗ und fallend ↘ kombiniert	↗ 14.8 ms steigend
25.6 ms ... steigend ↗ und fallend ↘ kombiniert	↘ 10.8 ms fallend
Die gemessenen Reaktionszeiten sind mittelmäßig und dadurch für Spieler eventuell zu langsam. Im Vergleich rangierten die bei uns getesteten Geräte von 0.8 (Minimum) zu 240 (Maximum) ms. » 47 % aller Screens waren schneller als der getestete. Daher sind die gemessenen Reaktionszeiten durchschnittlich (24 ms).
↔ Reaktionszeiten 50% Grau zu 80% Grau
26 ms ... steigend ↗ und fallend ↘ kombiniert	↗ 11.2 ms steigend
26 ms ... steigend ↗ und fallend ↘ kombiniert	↘ 14.8 ms fallend
Die gemessenen Reaktionszeiten sind mittelmäßig und dadurch für Spieler eventuell zu langsam. Im Vergleich rangierten die bei uns getesteten Geräte von 0.8 (Minimum) zu 636 (Maximum) ms. » 20 % aller Screens waren schneller als der getestete. Daher sind die gemessenen Reaktionszeiten besser als der Durchschnitt aller vermessenen Geräte (38.1 ms).

Bildschirm-Flackern / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Eine günstige Methode um die Helligkeit eines Bildschirms zu steuern, ist die Beleuchtung periodisch ein- und auszuschalten. Dies nennt sich PWM (Pulsweitenmodulation) Diese Umschaltung sollte mit einer hohen Frequenz stattfinden damit das menschliche Auge kein Flimmern wahrnimmt. Wenn die Frequenz zu niedrig ist, kann dies zu Ermüdungserscheinungen, Augenbrennen, Kopfweh und auch sichtbaren Flackern führen.

Flackern / PWM nicht festgestellt

Im Vergleich: 51 % aller getesteten Geräte nutzten kein PWM um die Helligkeit zu reduzieren. Wenn PWM eingesetzt wurde, dann bei einer Frequenz von durchschnittlich 14825 (Minimum 5, Maximum 2500000) Hz.

Weite IPS-Betrachtungswinkel. Kontrast und Farben werden unter extremen Blickwinkeln schlechter.

Leistung

Auch wenn sich GPU und das Display unterscheiden, ist im GU502LU der gleiche Core i7-10750H verbaut wie im GU502LW. Dennoch kann sich die CPU-Leistung voneinander unterscheiden, das hängt auch vom eingestellten Leistungsprofil im Armoury Crate ab. Wir haben deshalb alle Leistungsbenchmarks im Turbo-Modus durchgeführt.

Prozessor

Die Stabilität des Turbo-Boosts hat sich verbessert, wie unsere CineBench-R15-Multi-Thread-Schleife zeigt, zumindest wenn man den Turbo-Modus aktiviert. Im Performance-Modus brach die Leistung über die Zeit noch um 9 Prozent ein. Die reine CPU-Leistung entspricht in etwa der des preiswerteren Ryzen 5 4600H.

Im Akkumodus fällt die Prozessorleistung von 3164 auf 2528 Punkte im CineBench R20. Zu beachten ist hier allerdings, dass der Turbo-Modus abseits der Steckdose automatisch deaktiviert wird.

CineBench R20 (Performance-Modus am Netz)

CineBench R20 (Performance-Modus im Akkumodus)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1337 (1319.7-1347.21)

Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1226 (1200.59-1340.53)

Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1119 (1067.81-1225.19)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	6181 Points ∼100% +90%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	3956 Points ∼64% +21%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	3907 Points ∼63% +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3871 Points ∼63% +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	3869 Points ∼63% +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	3795 Points ∼61% +16%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	3505 Points ∼57% +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3271 Points ∼53% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	3261 Points ∼53%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points ∼46% -13%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	2410 Points ∼39% -26%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	493 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	490 Points ∼99% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	482 Points ∼98% +5%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	479 Points ∼97% +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points ∼97% +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	474 Points ∼96% +3%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	467 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	461 Points ∼94%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	436 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	421 Points ∼85% -9%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	2513 (2424.1^min - 2512.72^max) Points ∼100% +87%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points ∼72% +35%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1741 (1664.03^min - 1741.33^max) Points ∼69% +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1733 (1604.75^min - 1733.1^max) Points ∼69% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	1664 (1603.72^min - 1663.62^max) Points ∼66% +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	1634.29 (1595.85^min - 1741.4^max) Points ∼65% +21%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	1623 Points ∼65% +20%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1418 Points ∼56% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	1347 (1319.7^min - 1347.21^max) Points ∼54%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points ∼50% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1156 (1010.13^min - 1155.97^max) Points ∼46% -14%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	211 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	206 Points ∼98% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points ∼96% +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	198 Points ∼94% +4%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	197 Points ∼93% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	192 Points ∼91% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	191 Points ∼91%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points ∼88% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	186 Points ∼88% -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	176 Points ∼83% -8%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points ∼82% -9%

Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	527 Seconds * ∼100% -58%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	450 Seconds * ∼85% -35%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * ∼74% -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	337.2 Seconds * ∼64% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	333 Seconds * ∼63%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	284 Seconds * ∼54% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	284 Seconds * ∼54% +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	279 Seconds * ∼53% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	261 Seconds * ∼50% +22%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	179 Seconds * ∼34% +46%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5525 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	5367 MIPS ∼97% +7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	5349 MIPS ∼97% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	5114 MIPS ∼93% +2%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS ∼93% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	5031 MIPS ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	4655 MIPS ∼84% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	4622 MIPS ∼84% -8%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4584 MIPS ∼83% -9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4414 MIPS ∼80% -12%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	67252 MIPS ∼100% +83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	48392 MIPS ∼72% +32%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	47941 MIPS ∼71% +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	47806 MIPS ∼71% +30%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	47520 MIPS ∼71% +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	43805 MIPS ∼65% +19%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	37625 MIPS ∼56% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	36792 MIPS ∼55%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS ∼50% -8%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	33899 MIPS ∼50% -8%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1368 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	1336 Points ∼98% +9%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	1242 Points ∼91% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	1225 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	1188 Points ∼87% -3%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1154 Points ∼84% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1141 Points ∼83% -7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1116 Points ∼82% -9%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	10725 Points ∼100% +70%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8586 Points ∼80% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	7682 Points ∼72% +22%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	7583 Points ∼71% +20%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7453 Points ∼69% +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	6308 Points ∼59%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points ∼57% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	6068 Points ∼57% -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5739 Points ∼54% -9%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	19.8 fps ∼100% +83%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	13.5 fps ∼68% +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps ∼66% +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	12.348 fps ∼62% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	12 fps ∼61% +11%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	11.7 fps ∼59% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.8 fps ∼55%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	10.4 fps ∼53% -4%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps ∼49% -11%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	9.1 fps ∼46% -16%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	93.9 s * ∼100% -96%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	73.29 s * ∼78% -53%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	56.7 s * ∼60% -18%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * ∼57% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	48.4 s * ∼52% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	48 s * ∼51%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	47.1 s * ∼50% +2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	46.2 s * ∼49% +4%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	0.664 sec * ∼100% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.616 sec * ∼93%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * ∼92% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.61 sec * ∼92% +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.597 sec * ∼90% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H	0.597 sec * ∼90% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS	0.58 sec * ∼87% +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	0.567 sec * ∼85% +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.565 sec * ∼85% +8%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1347 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

141 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

191 Points

Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Systemleistung

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6254 Points ∼71% +19%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5241 - 5594, n=3)	5425 Points ∼62% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5241 Points ∼60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	5208 Points ∼59% -1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5127 Points ∼58% -2%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	4987 Points ∼57% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	4887 Points ∼56% -7%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	10017 Points ∼87% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9793 Points ∼85%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (9543 - 9793, n=3)	9683 Points ∼84% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	9008 Points ∼78% -8%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	8443 Points ∼73% -14%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	8378 Points ∼73% -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	8351 Points ∼73% -15%
Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8458 Points ∼76%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8193 Points ∼73% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	8058 Points ∼72% -5%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (7382 - 8458, n=3)	7846 Points ∼70% -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	7681 Points ∼69% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	7235 Points ∼65% -14%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	7119 Points ∼64% -16%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8088 Points ∼52% +72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	6345 Points ∼41% +35%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (4716 - 6354, n=3)	5758 Points ∼37% +22%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	5644 Points ∼36% +20%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5640 Points ∼36% +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4716 Points ∼30%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	4366 Points ∼28% -7%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	4853 Points ∼77% +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4516 Points ∼72% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4463 Points ∼71%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	4463 Points ∼71% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	3984 Points ∼63% -11%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	3702 Points ∼59% -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	3409 Points ∼54% -24%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5894 Points ∼83% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5764 Points ∼81%
Durchschnittliche Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	5764 Points ∼81% 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5507 Points ∼78% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	5319 Points ∼75% -8%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	4986 Points ∼70% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	4396 Points ∼62% -24%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4463 Punkte
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5764 Punkte
PCMark 10 Score		5241 Punkte
Hilfe

DPC-Latenzen

LatencyMon zeigt leider Probleme mit DPC-Latenzen beim Öffnen mehrerer Browsertabs auf. Die Wiedergabe unseres 4K/60fps-Testvideos auf YouTube läuft hingegen flüssig und ohne Dropped Frames ab.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	3177.9 μs * ∼100% -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2697.2 μs * ∼85%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	1654.11 μs * ∼52% +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	1481.1 μs * ∼47% +45%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1171.9 μs * ∼37% +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	723.4 μs * ∼23% +73%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Massenspeicher

Aufgeboten werden zwei M.2-PCIe-Schächte, leider gibt es keine 2.5-Zoll-Option. Die meisten Asus-Gaming-Laptops werden mit der Mittelklasse-SSD Intel 660p NVMe ausgeliefert und unser GU502LU bildet da keine Ausnahme. Die teureren SSDs Samsung PM981a oder Toshiba XG6 bieten deutlich höhere Übertragungsraten.

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD		53%	109%	11%	37%	148%
Seq Read	1197.92	2522.69 111%	2053 71%	1591.98 33%	2011.91 68%	2065.9 72%
Seq Write	675.6	1577.98 134%	2562 279%	1056.99 56%	1261.05 87%	2418.17 258%
4K Read	48.09	50.38 5%	42.46 -12%	34.12 -29%	43.66 -9%	54.18 13%
4K Write	112.69	115.63 3%	97.18 -14%	120.36 7%	109.31 -3%	128.97 14%
4K-64 Read	323.11	633.8 96%	1414.07 338%	410.08 27%	850.81 163%	1865.15 477%
4K-64 Write	789.55	1114.39 41%	1471.46 86%	634.05 -20%	780.22 -1%	1877.79 138%
Access Time Read *	0.067	0.095 -42%	0.079 -18%	0.072 -7%	0.117 -75%	0.042 37%
Access Time Write *	0.14	0.038 73%	0.039 72%	0.105 25%	0.036 74%	0.091 35%
Score Read	491	936 91%	1662 238%	613 25%	1096 123%	2126 333%
Score Write	970	1388 43%	1825 88%	860 -11%	1016 5%	2249 132%
Score Total	1704	2770 63%	4364 156%	1771 4%	2643 55%	5482 222%
Copy ISO MB/s	898.44	2105.67 134%	1913.35 113%	1254.95 40%	1481.3 65%	2926.74 226%
Copy Program MB/s	522.59	549.3 5%	832.89 59%	508.15 -3%	467.48 -11%	727.67 39%
Copy Game MB/s	947.58	853.57 -10%	1666.93 76%	986.17 4%	733.71 -23%	1613.89 70%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		43%	46%	21%	17%	63%
Write 4K	126.2	123 -3%	120 -5%	170.2 35%	145.4 15%	145 15%
Read 4K	52.92	52.49 -1%	36.09 -32%	52.54 -1%	51.6 -2%	46.84 -11%
Write Seq	934.2	1698 82%	1778 90%	1105 18%	1007 8%	2377 154%
Read Seq	1524	2440 60%	1362 -11%	1507 -1%	1145 -25%	2185 43%
Write 4K Q32T1	423.4	450.4 6%	429.1 1%	380.8 -10%	468.4 11%	463.5 9%
Read 4K Q32T1	338.3	550.4 63%	493.2 46%	530.8 57%	528.1 56%	526.5 56%
Write Seq Q32T1	959.8	1794 87%	2935.8 206%	1253 31%	1381 44%	2395 150%
Read Seq Q32T1	1832	2812 53%	3226.6 76%	2543 39%	2291 25%	3470 89%
Write 4K Q8T8			1536.2
Read 4K Q8T8			1489.6
Durchschnitt gesamt (Programm / Settings)		48% / 50%	78% / 87%	16% / 15%	27% / 30%	106% / 117%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1832 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 959.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1524 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 934.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 126.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

: Ø1415 (1212.78-1463.39)

Grafikleistung

Die hier verbaute GTX 1660 Ti ist im Turbo-Modus nur etwa 5 bis 8 Prozent langsamer als die RTX 2070 Max-Q im Performance-Modus. Wird die RTX 2070 Max-Q ebenfalls in den Turbo-Modus versetzt, so wächst der Unterschied auf 20 Prozent an. Im Akkumodus sinkt sowohl die CPU- als auch die GPU-Leistung beträchtlich.

Time Spy (Performance-Modus im Akkumodus)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	21237 Points ∼100% +29%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	18807 Points ∼89% +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	18169 Points ∼86% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	17321 Points ∼82% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	16488 Points ∼78%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	15913 Points ∼75% -3%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (14186 - 16488, n=24)	14867 Points ∼70% -10%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	14394 Points ∼68% -13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points ∼53% -31%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	10663 Points ∼50% -35%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	10550 Points ∼50% -36%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	9428 Points ∼44% -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	8171 Points ∼100% +33%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	7006 Points ∼86% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	6627 Points ∼81% +8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6312 Points ∼77% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	6123 Points ∼75%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6059 Points ∼74% -1%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5335 - 6123, n=22)	5653 Points ∼69% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	4548 Points ∼56% -26%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	3841 Points ∼47% -37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points ∼44% -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	3568 Points ∼44% -42%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	3539 Points ∼43% -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	7688 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	6909 Points ∼90% +10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6610 Points ∼86% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	6604 Points ∼86% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	6261 Points ∼81%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6154 Points ∼80% -2%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (4946 - 6261, n=21)	5717 Points ∼74% -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	4396 Points ∼57% -30%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	4131 Points ∼54% -34%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	3872 Points ∼50% -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3795 Points ∼49% -39%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	3559 Points ∼46% -43%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	28997 Points ∼100% +28%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	25706 Points ∼89% +13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	23335 Points ∼80% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	22670 Points ∼78%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	22516 Points ∼78% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	20723 Points ∼71% -9%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, n=24)	20096 Points ∼69% -11%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	18205 Points ∼63% -20%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	14437 Points ∼50% -36%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	14231 Points ∼49% -37%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	13575 Points ∼47% -40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points ∼44% -44%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	13167 Points ∼100% +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	13126 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	13061 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	12993 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	12942 Points ∼98% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12078 Points ∼92% -8%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (9500 - 13311, n=23)	12019 Points ∼91% -8%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	11620 Points ∼88% -11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	11561 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	7573 Points ∼58% -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points ∼52% -48%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	6838 Points ∼52% -48%

3DMark 11 Performance		19342 Punkte
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		38136 Punkte
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14649 Punkte
3DMark Time Spy Score		6261 Punkte
Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	107 fps ∼100% +67%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	79.7 fps ∼74% +25%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	66.1 fps ∼62% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	63.9 fps ∼60%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	60 fps ∼56% -6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	59.9 fps ∼56% -6%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)	59 fps ∼55% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	54.6 fps ∼51% -15%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	29.3 (8^min) fps ∼27% -54%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	140 fps ∼100% +60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	87.6 fps ∼63%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)	81.5 fps ∼58% -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	81.4 fps ∼58% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	74.1 fps ∼53% -15%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	74 fps ∼53% -16%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	51.6 (42^min) fps ∼37% -41%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	223.2 (201^min - 258^max) fps ∼100% +90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	168 (155^min - 175^max) fps ∼75% +43%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	160.8 (152^min - 177^max) fps ∼72% +37%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	155.8 fps ∼70% +32%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	152.3 fps ∼68% +30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	142 fps ∼64% +21%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	142 (114^min) fps ∼64% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	127.4 fps ∼57% +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	124.8 fps ∼56% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	117.6 (107^min - 128^max) fps ∼53%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	117.4 fps ∼53% 0%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	111 (96^min - 121^max) fps ∼50% -6%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (93 - 120, n=17)	105 fps ∼47% -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	104 (92^min - 111^max) fps ∼47% -12%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	103.6 (92^min - 110^max) fps ∼46% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	94.5 (85^min - 105^max) fps ∼42% -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	90.3 fps ∼40% -23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	76.1 (71^min - 80^max) fps ∼34% -35%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	70.9 fps ∼32% -40%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	68.9 fps ∼31% -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62.7 fps ∼28% -47%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	60 (48^min) fps ∼27% -49%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	113.2 (106^min - 129^max) fps ∼100% +74%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	85.7 (80^min - 91^max) fps ∼76% +32%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	82.1 (77^min - 86^max) fps ∼73% +26%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	80.6 fps ∼71% +24%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	80.3 fps ∼71% +23%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	78.4 fps ∼69% +20%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	76.3 (64^min) fps ∼67% +17%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	74.4 (62^min) fps ∼66% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	70.7 fps ∼62% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.3 fps ∼60% +5%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	67 (55^min) fps ∼59% +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	66.1 (62^min - 70^max) fps ∼58% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	65.1 (62^min - 69^max) fps ∼58%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	63.3 fps ∼56% -3%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	63.2 (57^min - 69^max) fps ∼56% -3%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	57 (47^min) fps ∼50% -12%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)	56.2 fps ∼50% -14%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	54.2 (46^min - 63^max) fps ∼48% -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	51.3 (47^min - 56^max) fps ∼45% -21%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	50.62 fps ∼45% -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	50.2 fps ∼44% -23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	40.1 (37^min - 44^max) fps ∼35% -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	40 fps ∼35% -39%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	39.8 (28^min) fps ∼35% -39%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	38.3 (31^min) fps ∼34% -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	36.2 fps ∼32% -44%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	158 (136.4^min) fps ∼100% +27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	135 (100.8^min) fps ∼85% +9%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	130 (113.1^min) fps ∼82% +5%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	128 (111.7^min) fps ∼81% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	124 (107.1^min) fps ∼78%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	122.1 (104.7^min) fps ∼77% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	122 (105.4^min) fps ∼77% -2%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	121 (106.1^min) fps ∼77% -2%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (103 - 130, n=11)	120 fps ∼76% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	119 (104.2^min) fps ∼75% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	118.8 (104.4^min) fps ∼75% -4%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	117 (102.5^min) fps ∼74% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	111 (95.8^min) fps ∼70% -10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	106 (91.5^min) fps ∼67% -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	106 (92.9^min) fps ∼67% -15%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	97.9 (85.2^min) fps ∼62% -21%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	93.3 (84.6^min) fps ∼59% -25%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	148 (127.7^min) fps ∼100% +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	129 (110.1^min) fps ∼87% +9%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	122 (104.6^min) fps ∼82% +3%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	120 (104.9^min) fps ∼81% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	118 (100.3^min) fps ∼80%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	117.1 (100.9^min) fps ∼79% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	115 (98.5^min) fps ∼78% -3%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	115 (100^min) fps ∼78% -3%
Durchschnittliche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (94.6 - 125, n=11)	114 fps ∼77% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	113.6 (100^min) fps ∼77% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	113.1 (100^min) fps ∼76% -4%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	111 (96.7^min) fps ∼75% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	104 (88.9^min) fps ∼70% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	103 (91.7^min) fps ∼70% -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	102 (88.8^min) fps ∼69% -14%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	94.7 (83.3^min) fps ∼64% -20%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	88.3 (79.8^min) fps ∼60% -25%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn

Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU vs. GU502LW: Wo liegen die Unterschiede?

Gehäuse

Kommunikation

Display

Reaktionszeiten (Response Times) des Displays

Bildschirm-Flackern / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Leistung

Prozessor

Systemleistung

DPC-Latenzen

Massenspeicher

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikleistung