NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M600M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M600M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 950M auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Wie bei der GM107 basierenden Quadro K620M / GeForce 940M sind jedoch nur 384 Shader aktiv, trotzdem bietet die M600M einen 128 Bit Speicherbus. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht. Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (80 vs 16 GB/s bei der K620M).

Im Lenovo Thinkpad P70 arbeitet die M600M mit 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) und einem Speichertakt von 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektiv).

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Dank dem 128 Bit großen Speicherbus liegt die Quadro M600M etwa 20 Prozent vor der alten Quadro K620M positionieren und ziemlich genau zwischen den Geschwistern Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. Im Consumerbereich wird die GeForce 940MX um etwa 10-15 % überholt, während die GeForce GTX 950M ihrerseits bis zu 20 % schneller arbeitet.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M600M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K620M und liegt bei 30 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA Quadro M600M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Cores1024 - unified384 - unified
Core694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz837 - 876 (Boost) MHz
Memory5508 MHz5012 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Memory4096 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12_1, 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Transistors4940 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size2/32/3
Introduced13.01.2017 02.10.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.4 pt (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (11%)     max: 1920 Points
719 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (9%)     max: 1750 Points
631 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (46%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (27%)     max: 22003 Points
13310 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
18491 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (16%)     max: 5275 Points
2322 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (13%)     max: 5869 Points
2430 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
73348 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (20%)     max: 7709 Points
3216 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (13%)     max: 7425 Points
2911 Points (5%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (15%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219 fps (24%)
104 fps (11%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.9 fps (16%)
59.4 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
111 fps (25%)
49.8 fps (11%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (23%)
45.9 fps (17%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (13%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
484 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (14%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
1016 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 (10%)
1754 (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (14%)
59.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (18%)
48.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 59% n=39

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
47%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
46%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
45%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
43%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
53%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
41%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
39%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
39%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
37%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
40%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
38%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
37%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
56%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
40%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
38%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
38%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
39%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
40%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
41%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
18 fps 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
40%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
61%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
44%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
41%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
43%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
51%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
46%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
47%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
46%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 43%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 41%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)