NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)

► remove

Die Nvidia Quadro T1000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Mittelklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GTX 1650 für Laptops, jedoch mit nur 768 Shader (versus 896 der GTX 1650). Die stärkere Quadro T2000 basiert auf den selben Chip, bietet jedoch doppelt so viele CUDA Kerne und ist damit deutlich schneller.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

► remove

Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große Notebooks / mobile Workstations. Die Max-Q Variante ist eine auf Effizienz optimierte Version der RTX 4000 mit verringerten Taktraten. Aktuell gibt es anscheinend 3 verschiedene Max-Q Varianten mit einem TGP von 90, 85 und 80 Watt.

VarianteShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile256011013501770
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560909601485
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560859001440
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560807801380
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Features

Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0). 

Performance

Je nach Variante, kann die Max-Q Version deutlich Performance zur normalen RTX 4000 einbüßen (bis zu 12 % weniger Boost-Takt). Dadurch kann sich die Max-Q Variante schon der Performance der RTX 3000 nähern. Bei Spielen sollte sich die Performance in der Nähe der mobilen RTX 2070 einreihen. 

Mit einem TGP von 80-90 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q trotzdem nur für größere Notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) (compare) 3072 @ 1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (compare) 3072 @ 600 - 930 - 1350 - 1455 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) (compare) 2560 @ 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) (compare) 1920 @ 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (compare) 1920 @ 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) (compare) 1024 @ 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q (compare) 1024 @ 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q (compare) 768 @ 795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) (compare) 3072 @ 1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (compare) 3072 @ 600 - 930 - 1350 - 1455 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) (compare) 2560 @ 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) (compare) 1920 @ 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (compare) 1920 @ 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) (compare) 1024 @ 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q (compare) 1024 @ 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q (compare) 768 @ 795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q1N19E-Q3 MAX-Q
ArchitectureTuringTuring
768 - 2560 -
Core1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Memory8000 MHz14000 MHz
Bus128 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Memory4096 MB8192 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
Technology12 nm12 nm
Size
Introduced27.05.2019 27.05.2019
Transistors10800 Million
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
3006 Points (23%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
2834 Points (20%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
23601 Points (40%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
48965 Points (27%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
6812 Points (25%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
7558 Points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
86096 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
10211 points (33%)
20697 points (66%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
10407 points (20%)
23464 points (46%)
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
36.7 fps (25%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
136.9 fps (61%)
SPECviewperf 12
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Solidworks (sw-04) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Siemens NX (snx-03) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Siemens NX (snx-03) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Showcase (showcase-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Showcase (showcase-02) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Medical (medical-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Maya (maya-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Maya (maya-05) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Energy (energy-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Creo (creo-02) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Creo (creo-02) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Catia (catia-05) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Catia (catia-05) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
269 fps (49%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
60.1 fps (16%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
145.6 fps (37%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
60 fps (35%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
1444 Samples/s (27%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
2969 Samples/s (27%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
5376 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 177%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
118  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
73  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
61  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
49  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
39  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
36  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
29  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
77  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
48  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
46  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
43  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
57  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
40  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
29  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
88  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
46  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
40  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
35  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
91  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
78  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
69  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
94  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
47.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
43.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
24.2  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
163.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
66.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
48.8  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
136.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
86  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
53.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
43.8  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
190.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
159.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
111.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
97.9  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
134 fps  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
115 fps  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
113 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
106 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
47.9 fps  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
156.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
94.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
52.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
30.9 fps  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
280.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
210  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
184.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
72.9  fps
Quadro T1000 (Laptop):
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 18.09.2017)