NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro P2000 ist eine mobile Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert auf wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop) auf den GP107 Chip mit 768 Shader. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Kaby-Lake-Generation gedacht.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Leistung
Die theoretische Leistung sollte vergleichbar zur GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q ?) sein (falls die Taktraten nicht massiv verringert wurden).
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T500 Mobile (oder auch Quadro T500 Mobile) für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce MX450 und bietet ebenso 896 Shader und einen 64 Bit Speicherbus. Der Boost-Takt ist jedoch anscheinend etwas höher. Wie auch die MX450 ist sie mit GDDR5 und GDDR6 erhältlich, aktuell gibt es 2 und 4 GB Speichervarianten. Der TDP ist mit 18 - 25 Watt je nach Variante spezifiziert.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Quadro Turing Serie Codename GP107GL Architektur Pascal Turing Pipelines 768 - unified 896 - unified Kerntakt 1215 - 1468 (Boost) MHz 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz Speichertakt 6008 MHz 10000 MHz Speicherbandbreite 128 Bit 64 Bit Speichertyp GDDR5 GDDR5, GDDR6 Max. Speichergröße 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory nein nein API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Herstellungsprozess 14 nm 12 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebookgröße mittel (15.4" z.B.) mittel (15.4" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 05.07.2017 27.05.2019 Stromverbrauch 25 Watt
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P2000
3.1 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2259 Points (7%)
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 93% 80%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2046 Points (5%)
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 93% 78%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
350317 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
75457 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23632 avg: 24335 median: 24335 (26%) max: 25038 Points
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (17%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 77%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 42598 avg: 43566 median: 43565.5 (11%) max: 44533 Points
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 61% 59%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6116 avg: 6160 median: 6160 (11%) max: 6204 Points
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 60% 76% 63%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6741 avg: 6847 median: 6847 (8%) max: 6953 Points
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 59% 74% 61%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
51884 Points (6%)
80696 Points (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 64% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8660 avg: 8699 median: 8699 (12%) max: 8738 Points
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (11%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 95% 96%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8201 avg: 8387 median: 8387 (7%) max: 8573 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 96% 94%
3DMark Vantage + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
32964 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
31451 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000
33795 Points (44%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 92%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
34.6 fps (11%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
86.1 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 12 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 103.8 avg: 103.9 median: 103.9 (26%) max: 104 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 65.8 avg: 66.7 median: 66.7 (10%) max: 67.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 30.42 avg: 30.6 median: 30.6 (7%) max: 30.73 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 22.84 avg: 23 median: 23 (6%) max: 23.11 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 59.2 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (16%) max: 60.3 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 5.27 avg: 5.4 median: 5.4 (5%) max: 5.62 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 65 avg: 65.1 median: 65.1 (26%) max: 65.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 69.6 avg: 70.2 median: 70.2 (12%) max: 70.8 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
71.9 fps (13%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
96.1 fps (26%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 85% 88% 68%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
121.9 fps (14%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 67% 78% 68%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
30.3 fps (7%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 62% 59%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
18.5 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 88% 85% 100% 80%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
89.3 fps (10%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 66% 71% 64%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
5.3 fps (2%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 97% 100% 97%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
82.1 fps (12%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 78% 71%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
104 fps (12%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 93% 82%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
71.7 fps (12%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 81% 70%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (8%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (9%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (7%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (12%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (10%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6782 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
133.3 fps (46%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
156.6 fps (54%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 85% 100%
Cinebench R15 + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 165.5 avg: 180.9 median: 180.9 (11%) max: 196.2 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 96% 69% 100% 79%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 870 avg: 1075 median: 1075 (5%) max: 1280 Samples/s
653 Samples/s (3%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 61%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2636 avg: 2692 median: 2691.5 (5%) max: 2747 Samples/s
1976 Samples/s (3%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 73%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 4723 avg: 4859 median: 4858.5 (5%) max: 4994 Points
4734 Points (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 97%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
76.5 Watt (17%)
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 107% 101%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.3 fps per Watt (34%)
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (42%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 84% 100% 81%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
46.5 dB(A) (74%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 97%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P2000 → 100% n=25 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 88% n=25
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
139 fps
58%
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
64%
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
68%
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
77%
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
104 fps
57%
T500 Laptop GPU:
5.7 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
201 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
144 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
115 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
169 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
101 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
201 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
105 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
249 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
164 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
110 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
125 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
244 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
119 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
350 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
288 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
162 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
114 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
116 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
112 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
101 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
130.2 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
115.4 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
102.4 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
97.5 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
109 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
71 76.1 ~ 74 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
33 43.2 ~ 38 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
24.3 26 ~ 25 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
133 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
317 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
213 fps
100%
Quadro P2000:
184 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro P2000 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 76% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 73%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
v1.26
log 20. 04:20:37
#0 checking url part for id 8886 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:37:06 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.122s ... 0.123s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.123s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.123s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8886 +0.05s ... 0.173s
#8 got single benchmarks 8886 +0.023s ... 0.196s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.02s ... 0.216s
#10 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.021s ... 0.237s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.237s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.41s ... 0.647s
#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.647s
#14 Got 245 rows for game benchmarks. +0.043s ... 0.69s
#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.69s
#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.03s ... 0.72s
#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.089s ... 0.809s
#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.809s
#19 return log +0.065s ... 0.874s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
